Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: FAA vs. AA Round 2: Saving Fuel by Not Turning on Lights

  1. #1
    Moderator Matt Molnar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,302

    FAA vs. AA Round 2: Saving Fuel by Not Turning on Lights

    AA Fuel Saving Method Raises Concerns

    POSTED: 7:31 pm CDT May 14, 2008

    DALLAS --Some air traffic controllers say they believe American Airlines is attempting to save fuel at the expense of safety, and risking the possibility of a runway collision, NBC 5 reported.

    The concerns stem from a near miss on a runway at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport in early April that is under investigation by the Federal Aviation Administration.

    It happened as American Airlines mechanics were towing a Boeing 777 to a maintenance hangar using a high-speed tug. Air traffic controllers told the mechanics to stop short of a runway, but they did not stop in time and pulled the jumbo jet into the path of another plane coming in for landing, NBC 5 reported.

    The pilot pulled up narrowly and avoided a collision, said Ric Loewen of The National Air Traffic Controllers Association. [Full Article]
    Ladies and gentlemen, this is your captain speaking. We have a small problem.
    All four engines have stopped. We are doing our damnedest to get them under control.
    I trust you are not in too much distress. —Captain Eric Moody, British Airways Flight 9

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    8,285

    Re: FAA vs. AA Round 2: Saving Fuel by Not Turning on Lights

    Can't the lights run on the planes battery? How much of a drain can it be?

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Brick, NJ
    Posts
    1,876

    Re: FAA vs. AA Round 2: Saving Fuel by Not Turning on Lights

    Quote Originally Posted by T-Bird76
    Can't the lights run on the planes battery? How much of a drain can it be?
    Tom I believe they have to power up the APU to turn the lights on

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Bronx, New York
    Posts
    3,117

    Re: FAA vs. AA Round 2: Saving Fuel by Not Turning on Lights

    Even with a supertug don't you still need a mechanic in the cockpit riding the brakes and working the radio like with a regular tug ? And to work the radio's the aircraft needs power, I would assume from the APU ?

    LGA777

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    In the vicinity of Zulu Alpha
    Posts
    63

    Re: FAA vs. AA Round 2: Saving Fuel by Not Turning on Lights

    Items such as radios and lights should be able to run from a DC service bus designed for that purpose. Not sure about specifics on the 777 but I'd imagine it has something similar to avoid unnecessary running of the APU and the associated fuel consumption.
    Worry is a sustained form of fear, caused by indecision.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    PTW R-090 12.9 DME/ ARD R-275 17.0 DME
    Posts
    351

    Re: FAA vs. AA Round 2: Saving Fuel by Not Turning on Lights

    I think on average the Battery and Buses can supply power without an APU operating for about 20 minutes.

    Ron, yes you always need someone brake riding be it an A&P or a Ramp Agent.

    Also the only light reqeuired to be on during a Tow is the Red Anti Collision light. Some Flight Ops departments have policies to turn on the White Anti Collision lights when even just crossing active runways.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •