Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: Crazy JFK Plan For The Future

  1. #1
    Senior Member Iberia A340-600's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    4,006

    Crazy JFK Plan For The Future


  2. #2
    Senior Member cancidas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    traffic two o'clock two miles southbound flight of four C-130s
    Posts
    6,088
    riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight....
    it is mathematically impossible for either hummingbirds, or helicopters to fly. fortunately, neither are aware of this.

  3. #3
    Administrator PhilDernerJr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Queens, NY
    Posts
    12,467
    I think that's a bit much.

    Their rial idea to link all three airports is interesting, except for the fact that for people in Manhattan trrying to get to JFK, the one that serves the most passengers, they have to go through LGA or EWR first.
    Email me anytime at [email protected].

  4. #4
    Moderator Matt Molnar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,302
    They apparently just winged this without actually looking at how airports operate.
    Ladies and gentlemen, this is your captain speaking. We have a small problem.
    All four engines have stopped. We are doing our damnedest to get them under control.
    I trust you are not in too much distress. —Captain Eric Moody, British Airways Flight 9

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    DTW
    Posts
    2,751
    That would never work, especially the runway setup, you can't have 2 operating runways so close to each other, the approach paths would be the same and therefore you couldn't use them at the same time.

    Like Gotham said, they have no idea how an airport operates...
    nwa FOREVER!

  6. #6
    Moderator mirrodie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Me like the Robert Downey Jr of cooooooookies!
    Posts
    5,746
    I had to examine that figure twice in an effort to try and figure out what they want.

    Seems like a solar blanket to be suspended above the entire airport, of course, with the exception of covering the runways?

    Not sure what the goal is. Seems like an obvious first cut rendition. As for the doubling of the runways, I like it but don't see it happening.

    Lastly, considering the "take the train to the plane," now known as "JFKairTrain" took 25 years to come to fruition, I doubt such an expansive task would be completed anytime soon :)
    And I, I took the path less traveled by
    and that has made all the difference......yet...
    I have a feeling a handle of people are going to be very interested in what I post in the near future.

    http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=187

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    8,285
    Very intertesting idea but very far fetched. Remote screening spread out all over the place leaves huge holes in the system and increases the risk of a breach. Also did they think what to do while the construction takes place? This kind of project would require JFK to basically shut down.

  8. #8
    Member AndrewM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    90
    uhhh.....while I appreciate their desire to think outside the box, and not every idea they have is bad, it seems like it was thought out by someone with no idea of how an airport operates. On page two where they show JFK in a before and after representation there are little plane silhouettes traveling in different directions on parallel runways. Maybe one is taxiing but I doubt it. If they didn't even know how a basic traffic pattern operates how are they figuring out the intricacies of design? Oh well, nice try I guess...

  9. #9
    Administrator PhilDernerJr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Queens, NY
    Posts
    12,467
    Quote Originally Posted by nwafan20
    ...you can't have 2 operating runways so close to each other, the approach paths would be the same and therefore you couldn't use them at the same time.
    Not necessarily. With two very close parallel runways built with minimum distnaces (150 feet apart, right?), you can have one plane on one waiting to depart while the other lands on the nearby one. Time is aved by not having to wait for the plane to clear the runway for the next plane to start it's roll or to even turn onto the runway.
    Email me anytime at [email protected].

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    8,285
    LAS's runways are right next to each other. One is used for departure and one arrivals. Works very well for them.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Ari707's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    West Hempstead, NY
    Posts
    1,153
    4. The end of fast-food ripoffs at the gate.
    Flight pushed back? Status boards at each shuttle hub let you wait out the delay at local restaurants and coffee shops, instead of their overpriced airport equivalents.

    And where wouldthese be? the hotdog truck by the shelter on rockaway tpk????
    Overheard on JFK TOWER - S Turns are fine, U-Turns are bad....

  12. #12
    Moderator Matt Molnar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,302
    More hilarity...this is actually a three page article.

    Map of their plan for a massive loop shuttle connecting all three airport, complete with a jetBlue 777 and an unmarked passenger 741 at the gate! http://nymag.com/news/features/27826/index2.html

    Intro, with illustration of "airport" entrance at Union Square: http://nymag.com/news/features/27826/index.html

    As far as the remote checkpoints go, I guess they never noticed the millions of dollars in ticket counter equipment and space collecting dust at the Jamaica AirTrain terminal. All these ideas have been thrown about before either officially or by hobbyists, and deemed impractical or too expensive. Similar quality maps have been drawn on internet message boards by non-professionals.
    Ladies and gentlemen, this is your captain speaking. We have a small problem.
    All four engines have stopped. We are doing our damnedest to get them under control.
    I trust you are not in too much distress. —Captain Eric Moody, British Airways Flight 9

  13. #13
    Senior Member lijk604's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    4 air miles SE of ISP.
    Posts
    4,141
    This is all well & good, albeit a bit far-fetched, but aside from the security holes, the roundabout way to get to JFK, etc...where is the estimated COST of this project. Considering the parallel runways, what are the planning to destoy? Cargo Road (Hangar 3,4,5, DHL, FedEx, USPS & US Customs?) They can't build inside the the runways as the JetBlue & BA Terminal's would then be too close to the active with no taxiway to get to them. Same on the otherside with the Delta terminals, and unless they plan on filling in Jamaica Bay....

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    DTW
    Posts
    2,751
    LAX's runways, by my estimation are a good 600 or so feet apart, the runways in that diagram can't be any further than 200 feet apart on the first set.
    nwa FOREVER!

  15. #15
    Moderator Matt Molnar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,302
    I would estimate the total cost at about $250 billion. Until Exxon finds an oil reserve under Central Park, these guys should pitch their services to the overly rich nutjobs in Dubai.
    Ladies and gentlemen, this is your captain speaking. We have a small problem.
    All four engines have stopped. We are doing our damnedest to get them under control.
    I trust you are not in too much distress. —Captain Eric Moody, British Airways Flight 9

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •