Just a couple of night shots while waiting for Eva.
This lens, while very sharp, is of an older design and the flaws show readily at night with strong light sources directly in the scene... it flares a lot and internal reflections are poorly controlled. Time to check out the new VR-II Nano Coated version.
Manny Gonzalez
Thrust Images | General Photography | R.I.P. Matt Molnar 1979-2013
BRING BACK THE KJFK/KLGA OBSERVATION DECKS
Manny.......very nice! I traded in my 70-200mm f/2.8 VR I and upgraded to the VR II. In my opinion the VR II performs like a champ.
Other than the focus breathing issue, I am sure it is a winner! I just can't see myself losing so much money on a lens that still performs admirable as long as I shield the front elements from strong lights...
anybody want a Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VR I cheap?
Manny Gonzalez
Thrust Images | General Photography | R.I.P. Matt Molnar 1979-2013
BRING BACK THE KJFK/KLGA OBSERVATION DECKS
If it said Canon on it I would...Originally Posted by gonzalu
anybody want a Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VR I cheap?All joking aside, I am in the market for something in that zoom range with f/2.8, just for Canon mount. Guess I'll be paying full price. haha
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks