Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: FAA details impact of tarmac rule on controllers

  1. #1
    Senior Member AirtrafficController's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Middle Village, NY
    Posts
    2,029

    FAA details impact of tarmac rule on controllers

    The US FAA has issued guidance for air traffic controllers to manage requests by pilots and airlines stemming from the Department of Transportation's (DOT) new three-hour tarmac rule starting 29 April.
    As part of the DOT's Enhancing Airline Passenger Protections rule, published in late December, carriers at medium and large hub airports must develop a contingency plan that allows for aircraft to return to the terminal if stranded on the airport surface for more than 3h after landing or leaving the gate.
    A likely unintended consequence of the rule will be higher workload for air traffic controllers.
    According to a notice issued by the FAA to air traffic organisations on 6 April, the agency's system command centre as well as affected en route and terminal control facilities will have to develop and review complex procedures for handling requests related to tarmac delays and reporting aircraft that violate the rule.
    In particular, controllers will be tasked with determining whether having an aircraft return to the terminal based on the 3h rule will cause a "significant disruption" of service at the airport, a finding that negates the rule and allows the aircraft to remain on the tarmac.
    FAA has outlined the criteria controllers must use to determine significant disruptions caused by the new tarmac regulations. Guidelines issued to controllers include determining if the aircraft returning to the gate would keep airborne traffic in a holding pattern for 15 minutes or longer, if an aircraft that is returning to gate is using an active taxiway that would cause delays in excess of 15 minutes and if allowing a delayed aircraft to taxi back to the gate would place other aircraft in jeopardy of violating the new rule.
    When notified that an aircraft has exceeded the 3h rule, controllers are then required to assemble an incident file including the flight plan of the aircraft, delay information included in its pre-departure clearance, phone calls to an airline's operation centre, audio files of the transmissions between the aircraft and controllers, position logs, radar data and other information. The records must be kept for one year, says the FAA.

    http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/20 ... llers.html

    Read the document here: http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/medi ... 10.745.pdf
    Aspires to become an Air Traffic Controller at Kennedy Tower.
    http://web01.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=31094

  2. #2
    Senior Member cancidas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    traffic two o'clock two miles southbound flight of four C-130s
    Posts
    6,088

    Re: FAA details impact of tarmac rule on controllers

    i already hate the 259 rule... and i haven't even had an even that required action on our part. IMO all this is a whole lot of BS to define the actions we already take to make sure our customers and crews are taken care of.
    it is mathematically impossible for either hummingbirds, or helicopters to fly. fortunately, neither are aware of this.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •