Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Scientists & Engineers Simulate Jet Colliding With WTC

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    The weather sucks in Seattle
    Posts
    4,899

    Scientists & Engineers Simulate Jet Colliding With WTC

    Scientists And Engineers Simulate Jet Colliding With World Trade Center
    Researchers at Purdue University have created a simulation that uses scientific principles to study in detail what likely happened when a commercial airliner crashed into the World Trade Center's North Tower on Sept. 11, 2001.

    The simulation could be used to better understand which elements in the building's structural core were affected, how they responded to the initial shock of the aircraft collision, and how the tower later collapsed from the ensuing fire fed by an estimated 10,000 gallons of jet fuel, said Mete Sozen, the Kettelhut Distinguished Professor of Structural Engineering in Purdue's School of Civil Engineering.

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 153219.htm
    The problem with socialism is that you eventually,
    run out of other people’s money.
    ” - Margaret Thatcher

  2. #2
    Senior Member NIKV69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    IFP, ISP, JFK, IGM, SAN, VCV, LGA, LAX, SEE, LAS
    Posts
    4,258
    Better understand? Is there a metal in this world that can withstand that temperature for any period of time?
    'My idea of a good picture is one that's in focus and of a famous person doing something unfamous.' Andy Warhol

  3. #3
    Administrator PhilDernerJr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Queens, NY
    Posts
    12,467
    So where's the simulation? I can't find thelink, only the article.
    Email me anytime at [email protected].

  4. #4
    Senior Member emshighway's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Middle Village
    Posts
    2,060
    Quote Originally Posted by NIKV69
    Better understand? Is there a metal in this world that can withstand that temperature for any period of time?
    The tempature didn't have to be at melting point but just enough to soften and weaken the metal.
    "The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.' "
    Ronald Reagan

  5. #5
    Senior Member NIKV69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    IFP, ISP, JFK, IGM, SAN, VCV, LGA, LAX, SEE, LAS
    Posts
    4,258
    Quote Originally Posted by emshighway
    The tempature didn't have to be at melting point but just enough to soften and weaken the metal.
    6 and a half of one 5 and a half etc.

    Any one with basic knowledge of those buildings knew the pancake effect would happen if enough floors gave way.
    'My idea of a good picture is one that's in focus and of a famous person doing something unfamous.' Andy Warhol

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Huntington
    Posts
    344
    I thought the latest report said the heat softened the floor joists so much that they deflected downward several feet. In the process of deflecting, they pulled on the exterior columns which were now the only structure holding up the building. (The jets took out the interior concrete core.) Once the exterior columns gave way, the section of building above the impact plunged to the ground bringing all the lower floors with it as it fell. So not so much one floor dropping onto the lower to start the chain reaction, but the whole top just ripping through everything.

  7. #7
    Moderator Matt Molnar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,302
    It's odd how the article cites the 10,000 gallons of jet fuel as the problem. Jet fuel does not burn very hot, and it was all burned away in a matter of minutes...it was the contents of the building...desks, chairs, computers, plastics, wood, paper, etc, that did the real damage.
    Ladies and gentlemen, this is your captain speaking. We have a small problem.
    All four engines have stopped. We are doing our damnedest to get them under control.
    I trust you are not in too much distress. —Captain Eric Moody, British Airways Flight 9

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    The weather sucks in Seattle
    Posts
    4,899
    Quote Originally Posted by GothamSpotter
    It's odd how the article cites the 10,000 gallons of jet fuel as the problem. Jet fuel does not burn very hot, and it was all burned away in a matter of minutes...it was the contents of the building...desks, chairs, computers, plastics, wood, paper, etc, that did the real damage.
    It was a combination of all factors,

    Here is a good illustration:

    The problem with socialism is that you eventually,
    run out of other people’s money.
    ” - Margaret Thatcher

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •