Page 59 of 92 FirstFirst ... 94955565758596061626369 ... LastLast
Results 871 to 885 of 1369

Thread: Post Your Recent REJECTIONS!

  1. #871
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    CYUL (Montreal)
    Posts
    21
    I just got this one rejected for level, I appealed it because the I checked the verticals are really vertical, I checked them with the grid in Photoshop, I'm very puzzelled with this one.


  2. #872
    Senior Member RomNYC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Away from home
    Posts
    499
    What about your horizontals? It may just be an optical illusion, but the runway and the background building do not seem horizontally leveled to me *at first glance*, which is most likely the only glance you will get from screeners. Otherwise, lovely shot! Hope it'll make it.

  3. #873
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,041
    It does look unlevel on first glance, but you can appeal and argue that the light pole right behind the A380 is perfectly vertical.

  4. #874
    Senior Member moose135's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    8,013
    Quote Originally Posted by heeshung View Post
    It does look unlevel on first glance, but you can appeal and argue that the light pole right behind the A380 is perfectly vertical.
    I submitted a shot of an NCPD helicopter making a medevac pickup at the Oyster Bay train station parking lot once. When I cropped it appropriately, nothing in the photo looked level, and there was a light pole, at an angle, prominently placed to the side of the helicopter. I made sure I included a note to the screeners explaining that the light pole was not level, and that I had leveled the photo to a building that was cropped out of the edge of the frame. It was accepted.

  5. #875

  6. #876
    Senior Member Roush6NY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Queens NY
    Posts
    1,360
    Mark, Ive had a few rejected for that reason too, I feel like they will accept it if its cropped right behind the wheels, I have some in queue like that, lets see ! That is one heck of a shot by the way
    Kaz T

    My Photos:

    JetPhotos
    KT Images NY

  7. #877
    Senior Member seahawks7757's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Edgewood, Washington, United States
    Posts
    1,241
    This one for level
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/seahawk...in/photostream

    For me that is caused by the angle you are shooting at from the top of the parking garage.
    http://brandonsaviationblog.blogspot.com/ My continuing updated Aviation Blog
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/seahawks7757/ My continuing updated photostream from BFI and sometimes SEA

  8. #878
    Senior Member gonzalu's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    The Bronx, New York
    Posts
    6,028
    As Kaz said, they and A.net have the same criteria to crop tight on the wheels if not showing full aircraft

    Quote Originally Posted by seahawks7757 View Post
    This one for level
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/seahawk...in/photostream

    For me that is caused by the angle you are shooting at from the top of the parking garage.
    I think if you align the right side doors it would get accepted... being close to the frame they are obviously concentrating on it as your eye is drawn to it. Give it a whirl ;-)
    Manny Gonzalez
    Thrust Images | General Photography | R.I.P. Matt Molnar 1979-2013
    BRING BACK THE KJFK/KLGA OBSERVATION DECKS

  9. #879
    Senior Member gonzalu's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    The Bronx, New York
    Posts
    6,028
    Quote Originally Posted by acote View Post
    I just got this one rejected for level, I appealed it because the I checked the verticals are really vertical, I checked them with the grid in Photoshop, I'm very puzzelled with this one.

    At first glance it does look like it is level, but two things to keep in mind:

    --A.net is really strict about this. I have had many of a long discussion about leveling in the forums. They are really strict about it
    --They screen your images at not only normal size but also zoom in to look at various details such as leveling

    If you see my example below, note that you are a bit off the mark by a hair on the left side mostly. Toss in a little CCW and you should be all in. RIGHT-CLICK | VIEW IMAGE to see the full size version.

    Manny Gonzalez
    Thrust Images | General Photography | R.I.P. Matt Molnar 1979-2013
    BRING BACK THE KJFK/KLGA OBSERVATION DECKS

  10. #880
    Senior Member Cary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    1,984
    - Subject too far / too much dead space

    Last edited by Cary; 05-22-2011 at 02:03 PM.
    AeroPX Aviation Photography - Website | Facebook
    AVP Talk (Aviation Photography Talk) - http://avptalk.com
    1/400 Diecast Aircraft Models - http://diecastwings.com

  11. #881
    Senior Member seahawks7757's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Edgewood, Washington, United States
    Posts
    1,241
    Seriously? I see what you were trying to do. I think you just got a super picky screener.
    http://brandonsaviationblog.blogspot.com/ My continuing updated Aviation Blog
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/seahawks7757/ My continuing updated photostream from BFI and sometimes SEA

  12. #882
    Senior Member steve1840's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    2,581
    This is even better than Cary's "dead space".......this one they said was digitally manipulated

    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3435835

    Needless to say I have appealed it.
    Steve Furst

    View my work @

    Furst Edition Photography
    JetPhotos.net

  13. #883
    Senior Member NIKV69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    IFP, ISP, JFK, IGM, SAN, VCV, LGA, LAX, SEE, LAS
    Posts
    4,258
    Quote Originally Posted by steve1840 View Post
    This is even better than Cary's "dead space".......this one they said was digitally manipulated

    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3435835

    Needless to say I have appealed it.

    Did they send a personal message saying what was manipulated?
    'My idea of a good picture is one that's in focus and of a famous person doing something unfamous.' Andy Warhol

  14. #884
    Senior Member steve1840's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    2,581
    Not at all! THats what bugs me. They reject it cause they think it was manipulated, but don't bother to tell me why they think that. In my appeal I stated that the only adjustments made to the photo where adjustments made in post processing that are outlined in the guides in there help section. Nothing more, nothing less. And I did ask them in the appeal if they could give me a brief explanation of why they believe it was manipulated. We'll see what they say.
    Steve Furst

    View my work @

    Furst Edition Photography
    JetPhotos.net

  15. #885
    Senior Member steve1840's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    2,581
    Quote Originally Posted by Cary View Post
    - Subject too far / too much dead space

    Cary, did you submit this as a particular aircraft, or as a ramp/terminal shot?
    Steve Furst

    View my work @

    Furst Edition Photography
    JetPhotos.net

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •