Post Your Recent REJECTIONS!

[Greg_NY]

Would appreciate some help on this.

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2942938

This is the second time this photo has been rejected and I am not sure which way to rotate it. I originally did it 5 degrees CCW.

Thanks!

[MarkLawrence]

Might be wrong Isaac - but - did you try the line on the top of the hangar door to the right of the Hawk??

[SmAlbany]

Would appreciate some help on this.

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2942938

This is the second time this photo has been rejected and I am not sure which way to rotate it. I originally did it 5 degrees CCW.

Thanks!

Probably the verticals on the light poles that got you the rejection. They all appear to be leaning to the right.

Do you use photoshop? It's an easy fix.

[Greg_NY]

Thanks for the suggestions. I will try again.

In the first submission, I did line up the light poles to be vertical, but that got rejected.

Thanks

[moose135]

That's a tough photo, Isaac - the light poles look like they lean to the right, but the hangar doors on the right side look like they lean to the left.

[MarkLawrence]

Why not post it in the pre-screening and I'm sure someone will be able to tell if it's right!

[Greg_NY]

That's a tough photo, Isaac - the light poles look like they lean to the right, but the hangar doors on the right side look like they lean to the left.

Maybe I'll take the average of the two... :lol:

[SmAlbany]

Thanks for the suggestions. I will try again.

In the first submission, I did line up the light poles to be vertical, but that got rejected.

Thanks

'shop out the light poles (oops, I didn't say that)

[megatop412]

Thing is, these got rejected for quality and compression, but that's only because they made me resize them, so when you blow them back up, of course they look jaggy:
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rej ... fdash8.jpg

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rej ... faa767.jpg

I don't understand anet. They even said one of them was too grainy, but both were shot at ISO 100. Am I doing something wrong when resizing them? They don't want anything bigger than 1200 pixels, but that's significantly smaller than some of the 'medium' size photos in the database.

Any help or tips are appreciated, kind people. Thank you

[seahawks7757]

Well the second one seems too dark, But the size limit with A.Net is 1600 but the picture needs to be suberb quality to be accepted at that size.

Best tip is do all of your coloring at the full size. Crop it, resize and then sharpen. Always do the sharpening very last. Hope that helps

[MarkLawrence]

I'm missing something or my laptop screen isn't showing me - where?

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2972974

[threeholerglory]

Mark-

At first glance it seems like the nose is a bit soft...particularly in the nose gear. The paint may throw off the blur alarm with the way it shines that it could be interpreted as soft. Just my thoughts

[MarkLawrence]

Here is another of those horizon things - I took the horizontal line on the building that is at the base of the control tower - it's attached to the control tower - but - I guess not - where would other take the line for the horizon??

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2991914

[moose135]

Last time I saw a tower like that, Mark, I was in Pisa I would run a vertical down the side of the tower and see how that looks.

[Chris102]

Can someone help me rotating this one? I can't find what would be the horizon.

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rej ... esized.jpg

Also, this was rejected for being dirty behind the rotors, but I think it's the clouds that give that affect. I equalized the image, and there are no dust spots behind the rotors.

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rej ... esized.jpg