Post Your Recent REJECTIONS!

[Chris102]

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1538844

Do you think there's anyway I could fix this one in Photoshop?

[T-Bird76]

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1538844

Do you think there's anyway I could fix this one in Photoshop?

That's a hard one, try about 25% more USM on it. Although the nose really is blurry.

[mirrodie]

To me, when you are discussing something and you don't have an answer, that's just wrong and doesn't help create clear lines of communication or understanding.

I like how you sidesteped that one. You see Nick, its not about the rejections persay but when I strive for clarity, often times its not found. And others hav ethe same problem. in fact, :

Just recently,. someone asked in an av photo thread in Anet about clarification and what did you post?

So am I that is why I am going to sit back and watch from far away

So what does that imply Nick? This is what it implies: You can't ask questions without getting flamed or some sort of negative reverb.

As for benchmarks Mario it's their site. They can do whatever they want. If they want stringent standards it's fine. There are other sites to upload. Rather than embark on logic and accusing them of all sorts of stuff

Nick, first, I know it is their site. But when they cannot communicate effectively, I question that. Second, I am not accusing them of anything malicious nor false. I've simply come to accept that.
Lastly, you really need to stop focusing on photos of my ass. I'm not a homophobe but you are beginning to scare me. All you do is bring up photos of my ass. Is there something wrong with you?

As for your double why not try to email Gary Watt who is a head screener. His door is always open as far as I am concerned and I am sure he can give you an answer.

As I said, I will continue this in email. I respect Gary, nuff said. But I will prove you wrong.

:mrgreen:

[NIKV69]

I like how you sidesteped that one. You see Nick, its not about the rejections persay but when I strive for clarity, often times its not found. And others hav ethe same problem. in fact, :

Actually Mario I did not sidestep anything. It's just that you don't want to hear the answer. Read my posts. Josh seemed to understand what I said so I would assume you can too.

you really need to stop focusing on photos of my ass. I'm not a homophobe but you are beginning to scare me. All you do is bring up photos of my ass. Is there something wrong with you?

Actually Mario if I ever turned homo I would not go for your scrawny ass. I was just using that as a way to explain why the screeners were not answering you. You have to remember they are human too and maybe did not appreciate your post about your ass rejection. Things like that stay with people. Remember you get more flies with honey than you do vinegar.

As I said, I will continue this in email. I respect Gary, nuff said. But I will prove you wrong.

I hope you do, good luck.

[wunaladreamin]

[img]http://www.wickedsunshine.com/WagePeace/Election2004/Images/AwJeez,NotThis****Again!.jpg[/img]

[G-BOAD]

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1555997

[Iberia A340-600]

Soft?

http://airliners.net/addphotos/rejectio ... d11ewr.jpg
http://airliners.net/addphotos/rejectio ... c10ewr.jpg
http://airliners.net/addphotos/rejectio ... d14320.jpg

They seem sharp to me. Anyone think they aren't sharp enough?

[heeshung]

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1556178

[stuart schechter]

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1556178

Funny, I have been in that helicopter going on a glacier tour.

CN is 9070

[heeshung]

Nice! Great experience. That was my first time in a helicopter. We were lucky and got sunshine that day. It was a strange to walk on ice and snow in the middle of the summer. I have photos of the glacier landing, but not sure if they're JP.net worthy.

Fresh glacier water is cold and tasty. :)

How'd you get to that trip? Mine was through my cruise's shore excursions.

By the way, thanks for the serial.

[moose135]

They seem sharp to me. Anyone think they aren't sharp enough?

The screener

They look OK to me, but then I can never tell - it always seems to be a crapshoot whether I'll get something rejected for soft or oversharpened, when they both look the same to me. :?

[NIKV69]

Gordon the FedEx needs some USM, the nose is a little soft. The CO looks ok maybe just needs a little more as well. Is your monitor calibrated?

[Iberia A340-600]

Thanks Nick and Moose. I added some USM to all three shots and added them back to the queue.

They also rejected my Qatar and Malaysia for overexposed and my Qatar got the common rejection as well.

Malaysia: http://airliners.net/addphotos/rejectio ... wrland.jpg

For some reason I can't find the Qatar shot...

About my calibrated screen, Nick. When Matt Thaler was here he kept telling me that I should get it calibrated and we never got around to it.

[NIKV69]

bout my calibrated screen, Nick. When Matt Thaler was here he kept telling me that I should get it calibrated and we never got around to it.

Ok, well keep in mind you are not looking at the same pic the screener is. I would do that ASAP

[njgtr82]

Ok so I'm gonna give it another try, is this a better edit:
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/mrdewr.jpg
Also thoughts on this one too please:
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ ... N-RKH2.jpg
Thanks
Bill