I think if you appeal the 707 it will get in, the staircase isn't that much of an obstruction.Originally Posted by Iberia A340-600
I think if you appeal the 707 it will get in, the staircase isn't that much of an obstruction.Originally Posted by Iberia A340-600
Thanks Josh and Tommy, it's been appealed.
Josh, I actually had the picture in the a.net queue but when I saw it was rejected on jp I took it out. I'll work on the blue tint and throw it back in.
Here is a rejection I got from anet this morning for quality:
http://airliners.net/addphotos/big/read ... fkland.jpg
I really don't see what is wrong with the quality so I appealed.
edit: The 707 shot just got rejected again "That is a typical obstruction/clutter rekection." Man that was fast!
Gordon, airliners.net will use the quality rejection for too little contrast, try boosting the contrast a bit, it does seem to need a bit.
nwa FOREVER!
nwa FOREVER!
I had gone 14 for my last 14 into jnet until this:
http://jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1545641
I can see how that is hard. If you brighten it, it blows the rear section of the hump out of proportion.
"lol retart"
Hmm I don't think that is to soft considering other shots in the database. Give it a small dose of USM and send it back up.Originally Posted by wunaladreamin
Thanks Tommy, I had the same thoughts you had and put it back up.
Did you add some USM?Originally Posted by wunaladreamin
In my very humble opinion, it looks a little overexposed near the tail on top of the fuselage.Originally Posted by wunaladreamin
Yes sir I did :)Did you add some USM?
You may be right, but it's up to the judge to decide. :)In my very humble opinion, it looks a little overexposed near the tail on top of the fuselage.
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1550342
I measured from the wheels down and from the tail up...
"lol retart"
Looks low to me Stuart. It may measure out the same from the wheels down and tail up, but it appears unbalanced to me. What I usually do when cropping is put the center point (cross-hairs) of the crop box on the window line of the fuselage, that usually results in a crop that "feels" centered. I may need to vary it a little depending on the aircraft type or angle of the shot, but that gives me a good starting point.
KC-135 - Passing gas & taking names!
http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=15086
http://moose135.smugmug.com
Stuart, this is the same method I use, BUT, you have to measure from the lowest part of the aircraft and the uppermost part of the aircraft. I "measured" your pic and you have 1.75 inches from the top to the top of tail and only 1.5 inches from the bottom to the nose gear. It needs to go UP in the frame about 1/4 of an inch to balance it out. The angle of the aircraft doesn't help you as the fuselage is angled up due to the fact its not a true side-on.Originally Posted by stuart schechter
I would avoid doing things like that. Use the grid but also look at the pic without the grid. Center the fuselage. It takes a lot of practice but you can get a feel for what is properly centered by eye.I measured from the wheels down and from the tail up...
'My idea of a good picture is one that's in focus and of a famous person doing something unfamous.' Andy Warhol
Bookmarks