Post Your Recent REJECTIONS!

[megatop412]

That All-Blacks shot is freakin phenominal man

Stick with Flickr, you'll get less heartburn

[Kris V]

I'm about ready to give up on A.Net, something like 0 for 30 in my recent uploads.

This one was rejected for quality, I have looked at it on 4 different screens and fail to see where the quality issue is.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/seahawk...n/photostream/


Then the head screener gave me an ass of a response back that I need to be more judgemental of my pics. If I thought they were crap I wouldn't have uploaded them in the first place.

To be honest I would be happy to have my last shot be the all blacks I had accepted a while ago-

Well on my Mac's screen I notice some small round bumps on the landing gear doors and the tip of the nose, but I don't think that has anything to do with the overall quality. Asides that I am stumped.

[Cary]

Two frustrating rejections, both appealed, both rejected again:

Color: "orange tint"


No kidding there's an orange tint. Do they think I'm stupid or color blind and can't see the orange? In appeal, I explained that you will get an orange tint when you shoot at FRG in those conditions, towards that direction, and showed some examples of my previously accepted FRG shots, and it still got rejected.









Perhaps all of those were incorrectly screened?

And this one is borderline, but the generator/cart is only blocking half of one set of gear, and normally, that's allowed. I only appealed it after seeing a similar shot that was accepted, however that has 1 set of gear completely blocked, with the remaining two partially blocked. The appeal was rejected with "Clearly a motive obstruction rejection."

[Cary]

Quality, Over-sharpened
"Titles over sharpened"

EDIT: accepted on appeal. Some faith restored

[lijk604]

Cary, they only accepted because there was no orange tint to the Lufty shot. ;)
Seriously though, good shots, shame on them if they don't want them.

[Cary]

Cary, they only accepted because there was no orange tint to the Lufty shot. ;)
Seriously though, good shots, shame on them if they don't want them.

Thanks, John. I was actually concerned (as I am with most late PM shots now), that it would get rejected for yellow tint, since there is a tad (from it being late PM). The good thing is they accepted it...the bad thing is they promoted two photos over it, when it would have been second to only Sam Chui's shot. I guess I can't have it both accepted and get a fair shot at Top 5. That would be expecting too much :)

[wunaladreamin]

Cary, they rejected you because they know you terrorized the Andrews JSOH!

[Cary]

Cary, they rejected you because they know you terrorized the Andrews JSOH!

You know it Actually, the going joke is that they always reject me for yellow tint, because I'm yel....Asian

[Chris102]

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...43img_7795.jpg

They rejected it because it's an unbalanced crop, but it's the unbalancing that makes it interesting! I may appeal.

[Delta777LR]

Blurry!
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3867868

Blurry
Bad Quality
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3867874

Heat Distortion
undersharpened(soft)
Blurry!
Horizon
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3867877

Undersharpened
Bad Color
Contrast
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3865399

[adscram14]

Blurry!
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3867868

Blurry
Bad Quality
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3867874

Heat Distortion
undersharpened(soft)
Blurry!
Horizon
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3867877

Undersharpened
Bad Color
Contrast
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3865399

Look at the regi on the first one, it is a bit blurry.

Second one seems hazed or the shutter wasn't fast enough. Look at the Star Alliance logo, it's messy.

For the third, look at the top of the plane. It's not straight, but jagged and soft.

Last one is just a weird contrast, and the quality is poor.

[MarkLawrence]

Bad quality - I'm looking for some guidance here guys - I had 4 rejected yesterday for bad quality - just looking for some pointers...

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3870178

[Cary]

Bad quality - I'm looking for some guidance here guys - I had 4 rejected yesterday for bad quality - just looking for some pointers...

I'm guessing it has to do with the heat haze, and how it's affecting the edges of the wings. Not a ton you can do about heat haze, but I'd say if you want to try to do something, to selectively sharpen the wings less than the rest of the plane. It seems to be affecting/distorting the closer wing tip area the most. See how the leading edge slats and back edge in your photo are a little "wavy" compared to something like this?



If you can mask the wavy look a bit, you might be able to get it in.

[moose135]

Looks like all I got were a bunch of crappy shuttle photos - all rejected by A.net

Distance and Oversharpened


Grainy and Dark


Grainy and Dark


Grainy, Soft, and Dark


Looks like the JP.net queue is running nearly 3 weeks, so it will be a while before I see if they reject them also.

[lijk604]

Moose, the real reason they rejected the first show was because the site is Airliners dot net, not Cranes.net

Second shot the sky is very grainy, looks like it was pushed too far in post.

Third, to me, looks like it needs contrast. I don't really see the grain, but definitely a lot of haze.

Fourth looks to suffer from heat haze, and you probably could brighten it up a bit.

Oh well, guess you'll just have to throw 'em all out.