Another one for digital manipulation.....again with no explanation.
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3435848
Another one for digital manipulation.....again with no explanation.
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3435848
Weird, keep us posted Steve.
'My idea of a good picture is one that's in focus and of a famous person doing something unfamous.' Andy Warhol
Steve, that's easy. Everyone clearly knows that an A319 does not have wings and yours clearly has wings... so nice try bud!
Seriously though it looks a bit underexposed... other than that, digital manipulation?
Manny Gonzalez
Thrust Images | General Photography | R.I.P. Matt Molnar 1979-2013
BRING BACK THE KJFK/KLGA OBSERVATION DECKS
I think I found it... Steve, did you cut corners and erase your logo?
![]()
Manny Gonzalez
Thrust Images | General Photography | R.I.P. Matt Molnar 1979-2013
BRING BACK THE KJFK/KLGA OBSERVATION DECKS
Yeah. I felt like an a@@ after i got an answer to my appeal. It finally hit me that i remembered erasing my logo from the photo. How do i get rid of my logo from a photo?
You do not... you simply RE-EDIT it and do not apply the logo to it before sending to the DB ;-)
Manny Gonzalez
Thrust Images | General Photography | R.I.P. Matt Molnar 1979-2013
BRING BACK THE KJFK/KLGA OBSERVATION DECKS
Thanks Manny. Thats what I figured, but just wanted to make sure there wasn't a way to go about doing it.
5 rejections on Anet
Soft
Weak contrast
Soft underwings and gears.. Can anyone see where that is?
Grainy
Oversharpened
Can anyone help me out with these issues?
Sergio has been a huge Delta Air Lines fan since 1992!!
Sergio Cardona
http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos....e=1&display=15
Sergio, the screening was spot on on all of them unfortunately... been there MANY times to know that
So, I have possible solutions for all of them if you're willing to give me a tryIf so, please contact me off-line and I ask for the originals (RAW hopefully, otherwise at least original JPGs) and I will edit to my taste and hopefully A.net standards. No promises of course, but at least we can get to a better starting point. I see the issues on all the above ... I think all may be salvageable... it is ALWAYS a learning experience so I appreciate the opportunity.
Thank you sir...
Manny Gonzalez
Thrust Images | General Photography | R.I.P. Matt Molnar 1979-2013
BRING BACK THE KJFK/KLGA OBSERVATION DECKS
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3451459
I don't see how much sharper I can goAny ideas ?
Kaz,
The original, I am betting, is a bit soft or even OOF :-) if you look at the SIZE of the jaggies, is a dead giveaway of the processing involved. So it looks like the OOF or blur was overcompensated for in post.
Or, the ORIGINAL crop you started with was less than 3000px which I use as my guide to properly reduce to 1200 pix wide final... if your crop is less than 3000 pix, you will not get a good result in my opinion... but given the new 16-18MP sensors, you may have enough left... just an observation :-)
Manny Gonzalez
Thrust Images | General Photography | R.I.P. Matt Molnar 1979-2013
BRING BACK THE KJFK/KLGA OBSERVATION DECKS
Thanks as always Manny, I will look into the original and see :)
Horizon level.. I dont see how its not leveled... help?
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3475159
Sergio has been a huge Delta Air Lines fan since 1992!!
Sergio Cardona
http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos....e=1&display=15
The vertical lines on the building look like they are leaning just slightly to the right. A touch of CCW rotation would help.
KC-135 - Passing gas & taking names!
http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=15086
http://moose135.smugmug.com
http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=3502489
Do you think this one is worth an appeal? Besides submitting an appeal, what do I say. "I think the contrast is just fine!" or what?
Jeremy in Minnesota
My pictures on jp.net
Bookmarks