Post Your Recent REJECTIONS!

[seahawks7757]

The vert stabalizer looks oversharpened as well. Honestly those lime green planes are rough to work with. Especially in high light. http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.p...6852368&nseq=8 I was amazed they ever took that one.

[heeshung]

It looks a bit oversaturated. The color also has a greenish tinge; it looks like you shot it through a window. Hopefully you don't mind; here's my edit:

[MarkLawrence]

Wow Mark - that is a good edit - yes - it was shot through a window unfortunately - Cape Town no longer has it's open deck - if you can give me an idea what you did to get that - I'll try it on the original!! Thanks!!

[heeshung]

I actually just auto-adjusted color in Photoshop, and then toned down the saturation by about -20.

[jerslice]

This is the second rejection in two weeks that I just don't understand for the life of me:

Motive (clipped the wingtip by a few pixels frame left) / soft:
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...23dpp_3319.jpg or viewed here: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4089/...5dc811c2_o.jpg

And this one for soft:
http://generalaviationphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=292

[NIKV69]

I just don't understand for the life of me

Pretty straightfoward. The Fedex needs a little more USM and some selective sharpening. Did the screener leave a personal message about the crop? Seems that is an easy fix. Second as well little more USM

[jerslice]

I guess I just disagree with it being soft - to me they seem pretty sharp. I also tend to think that a.net would rather see jaggies than a possible soft line but that's just me.

[Perriwen]

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3149871
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3149823

I'm tempted to appeal the second one.

[seahawks7757]

second one is nice.

[NIKV69]

I guess I just disagree with it being soft - to me they seem pretty sharp. I also tend to think that a.net would rather see jaggies than a possible soft line but that's just me.

They don't need much more. The Fedex's titles need sharpening and overall a little more also remember their monitors may not be the same calibaration and your not looking at the same picture. It's always better to go too much then too little I have found. Anet is picky on the sharpness it is what it is.

I'm tempted to appeal the second one.

What is the cropping reject for? What does photo edges mean? I don't see any borders and that shot can be reworked to get in.

[MarkLawrence]

I'm having a problem seeing where it's blurry....can someone help?

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3160103

[gonzalu]

Hello,

It is my first post to Airliners.net and while I expected to be rejected (well, just because I feel they just reject all first posts no matter what) I was surprised at some of the observations, not to mention that I had to wait 8 days ;-):

Reject reason: Your photo is of insufficient quality to upload at such a large size - please aim for a finished size of 1024 next time; low in frame quality soft dark centered personal



original upload size here
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...se_mag8498.jpg

-Personal: maybe
-Low in frame: yeah well, crop ratio would suffer if not cropped this way
-Dark: perhaps
-soft: Really? I mean, on my end it looks properly sharp, at least the bird itself.
-Not enough quality for size: Hmmm, oh well, I guess we'll disagree.

What do you all think? :-)

Thanks... try try again!

[moose135]

Manny, if I remember, "Personal" usually means the screener included a personal message in the rejection, check the e-mail you received. It is low in the frame - you cut off the marshaller's feet, but left a lot of empty space above the helicopter. Dark - maybe, would have to check the histogram. And there really isn't any reason to upload at larger than 1024px, and it helps with the quality unless your original is spot on.

[gonzalu]

Thanks Moose... I agree about the cropped feet and the empty space above sure... I guess the one I can't get over is the sharpness/quality one LOL. I can tell you it is sharp (you may be able to tell yourself, maybe I am smoking) in any case, I will surely not give up of course :-)

Thanks for your advise !

[gonzalu]

Centered rejection... why? Clearly the elevators are the reason I centered it that way lol. Also rejected for Grainy. is it really that grainy? Oh well, this is my 5th rejection. I'll NEVER get in hahahahaha. I have seen much worse entries than this one. Also this was a particularly rare entry as there are none like it in the database