Post Your Recent REJECTIONS!

[FlyNavy]

Rejected for similar photo uploaded and underexposed. Blast!
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1580760

[Iberia A340-600]

Thanks guys for all the tips. I brought my meter down yesterday to around -3 and it seemed like there wasn't too much overexposed action going on in my LCD screen after that happened.

Please take a look and tell me what you think:

viewtopic.php?f=11&t=8182

[NIKV69]

Please take a look and tell me what you think:

Looks much better Gordon, tho the Star Alliance and some others didn't have the sun directly hitting the subject. What did you have your settings at? What were they at JFK that day?

[Iberia A340-600]

Thanks Nick, when the Air Canada A340-300 took off the light was still slowly switching to the right side for that spot so I guess the light really didn't get great till around 3:00pm.

My settings from yesterday were:

Aperture: 6.3
ISO: 100
Exposure Comp: -0.3

And from the other day they were basically the same except the Exposure Comp was set to 0.

[NIKV69]

Aperture: 6.3
ISO: 100
Exposure Comp: -0.3

And from the other day they were basically the same except the Exposure Comp was set to 0.

Hmm, ok. I have been trying to stay away from using any exp comp and getting good results. LAS had some harsh sun and I didn't need it. If you got the sun hitting the aircraft use F8 with a shutter of 800 and bump that ISO up a tad. With good conditions you should not get any grain. Also try to photograph the fusleage at angles where the sun is not as harsh hitting it. I know white fuselages are a pain but experiment a bit and check that histogram.

[heeshung]

http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=1583212

[nwafan20]

Ugh, I hate technical rejections:

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1585368 -Bad C/N, Ugh, I used the auto-fill, I would have no other way of finding out the C/N, why would JP.net reject it for information they don't have themselves???

bad post and overexposed:
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1585366

Overexposed
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1585364

[FlyNavy]

BTW, the C/N for EI-DRC is 35116/2081. I'd play with the levels a bit on your two last overexposed shots.

[SmAlbany]

I thought that this one was pretty picky, even by a.net standards:

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/reje ... 1307_2.jpg

Rejected for centering and distance. I'll have to decide if I feel like re-editing. Supposed to be rainy today, maybe I'll have some time on my hands.

[NIKV69]

I thought that this one was pretty picky, even by a.net standards:

I agree with the distance. As for center it looks ok. There is some dead space bottom left. Maybe after you crop it tighter it will look better.

[T-Bird76]

I thought that this one was pretty picky, even by a.net standards:

I agree with the distance. As for center it looks ok. There is some dead space bottom left. Maybe after you crop it tighter it will look better.

I'd say the total opposite. Distance is fine but the centering off, to much space infront of the nose.

[pgengler]

Got a bunch rejected for "Over processed / Bad postprocessing". Can anyone enlighten me on what this means?

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1602970
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1602974 (this one also got oversharpened, which I didn't see when I was processing)
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1602975
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1602978

[NIKV69]

I am on my bosses laptop so I can't equalize the pics but that rejection can usually mean going overboard with the spot healing brush. As for the ANA it has a ton of jaggies. Look at the fuselage right before the tail.

[pgengler]

I am on my bosses laptop so I can't equalize the pics but that rejection can usually mean going overboard with the spot healing brush. As for the ANA it has a ton of jaggies. Look at the fuselage right before the tail.

Yeah, as soon as I saw the ANA one on my work laptop, instead of my home PC, I noticed that it was way oversharpened. I'll have to double-check in Photoshop, but I didn't really do much with the healing brush in these, just removing dust spots, same as I've always done.

[NIKV69]

I just equalized the ANA, looks ok except for a bit of a halo on top of the fuselage. The Supertanker looks worked to death though you can tell it has had a lot of work in PS. Email the screener and see what he says.