Post Your Recent REJECTIONS!

[Iberia A340-600]

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1559194

I appealed since auto-fill marked cargo and got this in response:

Nope, auto-fill does not select any categories at all.

Since when?

[nwafan20]

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1559194

I appealed since auto-fill marked cargo and got this in response:

Nope, auto-fill does not select any categories at all.

Since when?

Since always, I got rejected for my Cargo 360 for the same reason.

[stuart schechter]

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1560016

Argh!! So I have no idea what to do.

[nwafan20]

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1560016

Argh!! So I have no idea what to do.

Try starting from scratch and doing it over agian.

[Mateo]

It looks like you pumped up the saturation on the red. The little triangle on the front looks un-natural, and then when you realize it's the same colour as the tail, the whole picture looks screwed-with (more than they want you to screw with it ;) )

[njgtr82]

Rejected again for jaggies
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/reje ... mrdewr.jpg
And soft:
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/reje ... N-RKH2.jpg

[nwafan20]

Rejected again for jaggies
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/reje ... mrdewr.jpg

I think they are being a bit picky with that rejection, it is no worse with jaggies than other shots they have accepted in the past week!

[NIKV69]

Rejected again for jaggies

I still see some in the shot. Did you redo the shot? Back off the sharpening a little I think your there. You got the original, post it. If the capture is good you may not need much USM at all.

[njgtr82]

Rejected again for jaggies

I still see some in the shot. Did you redo the shot? Back off the sharpening a little I think your there. You got the original, post it. If the capture is good you may not need much USM at all.

I don't know of anywhere to host the full size but heres the unedited at 1024
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1011/128 ... 23c7_b.jpg

[T-Bird76]

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1559194

I appealed since auto-fill marked cargo and got this in response:

Nope, auto-fill does not select any categories at all.

Since when?

Since forever.

[lijk604]

A whole world of rejects here... :(

http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=1571486

[AirtrafficController]

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1573270

[njgtr82]

so this one is considered a special scheme huh? also I'm not sold on the contrast issue:
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1573455

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1573395

From looking at the pics in the DB it seemed this plane operates both VIP and regular flights so I left it alone and comments on the framing please
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1573389

Bill

[moose135]

Bill - your Kuwaiti 747 definitely looks too high in the frame. The Argentine 340 looks a little high as well, although not as much.

[NIKV69]

I'm not sold on the contrast issue:

The rejection is correct, compare my shot of Lennon to yours. It's easy to see the contrast is way off. http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1242311/L/

your Kuwaiti 747 definitely looks too high in the frame

Moose is right, too much dead space below the AC.

All are prob fixable.