Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: NIMBYs Freaking Out Over New EWR Arrival Path

  1. #1
    Moderator Matt Molnar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,302

    NIMBYs Freaking Out Over New EWR Arrival Path

    New flight path could bring 200 to 400 more planes over Rockland daily

    By KHURRAM SAEED
    THE JOURNAL NEWS

    (Original publication: June 29, 2007)

    WOODCLIFF LAKE, N.J. - The Federal Aviation Administration wants to create a new flight path that would mean 200 to 400 planes passing over Rockland each day by 2011.

    The flights would be headed to Newark Liberty International Airport, entering Rockland about 5,000 feet — less than a mile — above Harriman State Park and curving through the heart of the county, including Monsey, Chestnut Ridge and Pearl River.

    ...

    More than 1,000 people, mostly New Jersey residents, attended the raucous meeting. Some accused the FAA of not telling residents about the plan and putting them at risk. The meeting became so tense that police were called in.

    ...

    Posters hung around the room read "Their Arrival vs Our Survival" and "Is Today's Truth Tomorrow's Error?" More...
    :roll:
    Ladies and gentlemen, this is your captain speaking. We have a small problem.
    All four engines have stopped. We are doing our damnedest to get them under control.
    I trust you are not in too much distress. —Captain Eric Moody, British Airways Flight 9

  2. #2
    Senior Member hiss srq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Around here and near there.
    Posts
    5,565
    These people need to run as fast as they can at a spike.
    Southwest Airlines-"Once it pop's it's time to stop" Southwest Airlines-"Our Shamu's are almost real" Southwest Airlines -"We blow our top real easy" Southwest Airlines- "You can't top us..... really"

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    205
    I love how they advertise 5000 feet as less than a mile when in reality it's only 200 feet less than a mile, and 200 feet wouldn't make much of a difference.
    Nick S. @ EWR

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Within earshot of MD-80s who don't "Over fly Prospect Park to the extent practical"
    Posts
    1,517
    Would they prefer having to drive an hour and a half to JFK or SWF when they want to fly somewhere??

  5. #5
    Moderator Matt Molnar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,302
    A modern aircraft ascending through 5,000 feet is very quiet. A modern aircraft descending through 5,000 feet with its engines nearly idle is practically inaudible.

    Also, I've lived beneath LGA and JFK arrival and departure traffic much lower than 5,000 feet my entire life, and not once have I been sprayed by a fuel dump.
    Ladies and gentlemen, this is your captain speaking. We have a small problem.
    All four engines have stopped. We are doing our damnedest to get them under control.
    I trust you are not in too much distress. —Captain Eric Moody, British Airways Flight 9

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Cortlandt Manor NY Under HPN ILS 16
    Posts
    1,427
    fears about fuel dumping during emergencies.
    Did anyone ever think that the planes go out into the ocean. F%cking stupid people.
    "lol retart"

  7. #7
    Member skipper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    KEWR
    Posts
    53
    I love when people buy houses close to an airport because they are 1/2 the price of houses further away and have lower property taxes and then lobby against the airlines. Orange County (CA) is a prime example with noise abatement procedures and curfews.

    The noise level of an approaching aircraft on final are minimal. Engines are cut back to between 20-60% power on decent and modern engines are very quiet to begin with. The days of the 737 100/200 and 727 have passed.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beacon, NY
    Posts
    141
    I live in Emerson which is part of the proposed flight path, people have been going door-to-door with fliers making a big stink over it all, I mean its not like these are 707's and DC-8's ( little engine of course) flying over, these a/c's are really pretty quiet and I don't get what all th fuss is about, my dad said the only thing that he was concerned about is that it has the potential to make property value decrease... thats just my 2 cents
    FAA Licensed Airframe & Powerplant Mechanic
    Student Pilot

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Within earshot of MD-80s who don't "Over fly Prospect Park to the extent practical"
    Posts
    1,517
    Quote Originally Posted by skipper
    I love when people buy houses close to an airport because they are 1/2 the price of houses further away and have lower property taxes and then lobby against the airlines. Orange County (CA) is a prime example with noise abatement procedures and curfews.
    This is happening to DEN again. When Stapleton was built, it was out in the middle of nowhere. But then people started moving near the airport, complaining about the noise, and eventually forcing the airport to move. Now they have Denver International, which is out in the middle of nowhere, but people are starting to move near the airport. Wash, rinse, repeat.

    (Note: This isn't at all what's happening at EWR. The people in Rockland County who are complaining live at least 35 miles from the airport, as the crow flies, and probably further as the MD-80 flies.)

  10. #10
    Senior Member 727C47's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    DTW,YIP,JFK,EWR,SMQ,
    Posts
    808
    Quote Originally Posted by skipper
    I love when people buy houses close to an airport because they are 1/2 the price of houses further away and have lower property taxes and then lobby against the airlines. Orange County (CA) is a prime example with noise abatement procedures and curfews.

    The noise level of an approaching aircraft on final are minimal. Engines are cut back to between 20-60% power on decent and modern engines are very quiet to begin with. The days of the 737 100/200 and 727 have passed.
    Not at Champion Air baby !!!!!
    The beehive hummm of the JT9D and GE CF680C2,the thunder of the JT8D-17,the rumble of the PW1830 and the high ,thin whine of the PW 545A are all music to my ears!

  11. #11
    Member skipper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    KEWR
    Posts
    53
    Not at Champion Air baby !!!!![/quote]


    :lol:

  12. #12
    Senior Member cancidas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    traffic two o'clock two miles southbound flight of four C-130s
    Posts
    6,088
    Quote Originally Posted by skipper
    I love when people buy houses close to an airport because they are 1/2 the price of houses further away and have lower property taxes and then lobby against the airlines. Orange County (CA) is a prime example with noise abatement procedures and curfews.
    this happens even here at home with our airports. i went to a town hall meeting at FRG a few years back, everyone one bitching and moaning. the airport manager stood up, said to them all that the airport was built in 19XX (don't rememebr the year right now) and he doubted that anyone had owned thier houses that long. he literally walked away from the podium and that was the end of the meeting.
    it is mathematically impossible for either hummingbirds, or helicopters to fly. fortunately, neither are aware of this.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    205
    Quote Originally Posted by skipper
    I love when people buy houses close to an airport because they are 1/2 the price of houses further away and have lower property taxes and then lobby against the airlines. Orange County (CA) is a prime example with noise abatement procedures and curfews.

    The noise level of an approaching aircraft on final are minimal. Engines are cut back to between 20-60% power on decent and modern engines are very quiet to begin with. The days of the 737 100/200 and 727 have passed.
    The town that's cited in the article is really not close to EWR at all so I doubt their house prices were affected by it. The problem for them is that they are almost directly under a straight approach for runways 22L and 22R. But I think New Jerseyeans should be glad they have such a resource as EWR. Not only does it bring tax revenue but it has a ton of domestic and international flights.
    Nick S. @ EWR

  14. #14
    Senior Member Tom_Turner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,193
    Quote Originally Posted by NcSchu

    The town that's cited in the article is really not close to EWR at all so I doubt their house prices were affected by it. The problem for them is that they are almost directly under a straight approach for runways 22L and 22R. But I think New Jerseyeans should be glad they have such a resource as EWR. Not only does it bring tax revenue but it has a ton of domestic and international flights.
    Yes, that is the situation, and the people in a couple of these towns would quite frankly prefer the aircraft to do whatever is neccesary to fly over someone else's house not under a straight approach. The airport is IN New Jersey; let let the planes fly over New Jersey.

    Tom
    "Keep 'em Flying"

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •