Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 29 of 29

Thread: US Airways proposes merger with Delta...

  1. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    2,323
    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/15/busin ... r=homepage

    November 15, 2006
    US Airways Bids $8 Billion for Delta

    By JEREMY W. PETERS
    US Airways offered today to acquire Delta Air Lines, now under bankruptcy-court protection, for $8 billion.

    The combined company would carry more passengers each year than any other airline in the world, eclipsing American Airlines, the current leader.

    The offer, extended to Delta’s bankruptcy lenders, is an attempt by the chief executive of US Airways, W. Douglas Parker, to circumvent Delta’s top management, who rebuffed two earlier approaches from Mr. Parker about merging the two airlines.

    In a letter today addressed to Delta’s chief executive, Gerald Grinstein, Mr. Parker said he was disappointed that the two executives could not reach an agreement.

    US Airways said today that it is offering $4 billion in cash, plus US Airways stock that was valued at $4 billion at the close on Tuesday. That price would represent a substantial premium for Delta’s creditors over what the airline’s unsecured debts now trade for. The creditors would own about 45 percent of the combined company.

    Today, shares of US Airways jumped $8.57, or 16.8 percent, to close at $59.50 on the New York Stock Exchange. Other airline stocks including Continental and Airtran Holdings also rose.

    A Delta-US Airways merger would further consolidate an industry that has already shrunk considerably — and painfully — over the past five years. Rising oil prices, plummeting profits, a wave of bankruptcies and disruptive labor strife have roiled the nation’s airlines since the Sept. 11 attacks. And as the old-line carriers have struggled to cope with an onslaught from low-fare airlines like JetBlue and Southwest, analysts have predicted that there would be fewer airlines flying over American skies by the end of the decade.

    US Airways said the merger would save at least $1.65 billion in operating costs each year by combining facilities at some airports, eliminating overlapping flights and cutting capacity by about 10 percent.

    Mr. Parker said in a conference call with analysts and reporters this morning that the figure could be even greater. “This is not value that either of our companies could create independently,” he said. “This only happens when the companies get together, and that’s why this is so important.”

    Mr. Parker contacted Mr. Grinstein this spring to suggest a merger, but Mr. Grinstein resisted the idea. At the time, he said he felt that Delta preferred to reorganize and emerge from bankruptcy on its own, according to reports. Mr. Parker said he tried again in September, but was once again rebuffed.

    “I was disappointed that you declined to meet or even enter into discussions in your letter of October 17, 2006,” Mr. Parker said a letter to Mr. Grinstein, dated today, that was included in the news release announcing the proposed acquisition. “Because the benefits of a merger of US Airways and Delta are so compelling to both of our companies’ stakeholders, we believe it is important to inform them about our proposal.”

    Today, Mr. Grinstein again dismissed the idea of a merger. “Delta’s plan has always been to emerge from bankruptcy in the first half of 2007 as a strong, stand-alone carrier,” he wrote in a statement posted on Delta’s Website. “Our plan is working, and we are proud of the progress Delta people are making to achieve this objective.”

    Under the terms of the deal that US Airway proposed today, the new airline would adopt the Delta name, with Mr. Parker as chief executive leading a combined management team. Nothing was said about a role for Mr. Grinstein.

    Many analysts have been saying for years that the United States airline industry suffers from overcapacity. Several of the largest carriers have touched down in bankruptcy court in recent years, with Delta and Northwest Airlines seeking protection on the same day last year. US Airways itself has filed for bankruptcy protection twice.

    As recently as a few years ago, some analysts thought US Airways’ days were numbered, given its high costs and dependence on short-hop routes in the East. The idea that it might someday be in a position to acquire two other airlines was unthinkable then.

    But since its emergence from bankruptcy last year, US Airways has undergone a stunning reversal of fortune. It merged with America West in a partnership that greatly extended its domestic reach, and shares of the combined company have risen sharply since then.

    The widespread expectation in the industry had been that Delta would find a merger partner after emerging from bankruptcy, not before, and that the airlines it has relationships with now, most notably Northwest and Continental, would be the most likely partners.

    US Airways said its offer would yield more value for Delta’s unsecured creditors than Delta could deliver by reorganizing on its own. Delta’s unsecured debt has recently traded at 40 cents on the dollar, US Airways said.

    Last year, Delta flew approximately 86 million passengers globally, according to the International Air Transport Association, about 12 million fewer passengers than American. US Airways flew about 37 million passengers.

    Both airlines have had problems in recent years with their labor unions, principally the Air Line Pilots’ Association, whose resistance to pay cuts and other concessions was an important factor in forcing Delta into bankruptcy. And both have struggled to cope with low-price competitors like JetBlue and Southwest.

    Mr. Parker said he was confident that the merger would be satisfactory to the various labor unions at each airline. He said that when it came to eliminating jobs, US Airways would prefer to do so by leaving vacant positions unfilled rather than through layoffs, he said.

    Mr. Parker said he was confident that the proposed combination would pass muster under antitrust laws, though US Airways and Delta are the operators of the two rival shuttle services in the intensely competitive Boston-New York-Washington corridor. Mr. Parker suggested that the combined airline could simply sell one of the shuttle operations to satisfy regulators. “There are no antitrust issues that can’t be resolved,” he said.

    Analysts said that a merger between Delta and US Airways could result in a leaner, more efficient airline. “Even though airline mergers tend to be messy while employees, cultures and fleet types are integrated,” said Ray Neidl, an analyst with Calyon Securities, “in the long term a merged carrier should benefit in synergies from revenue generation, the ability to cut overhead costs, and the probability that marginal hubs would be closed.”

    Micheline Maynard and Peter Edmonston contributed reporting.

  2. #17
    Senior Member hiss srq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Around here and near there.
    Posts
    5,565
    I hope this does not happen. Our boss is a major genius in te industry but I do not want tosee us merge with Delta nor take the Delta brand I personally find pride in the fact that I make US fly and I do not want to have to live by some delta slogan. This will not happen is the consensus right now among us airways employees and I do not think Delta employees want it either.
    Southwest Airlines-"Once it pop's it's time to stop" Southwest Airlines-"Our Shamu's are almost real" Southwest Airlines -"We blow our top real easy" Southwest Airlines- "You can't top us..... really"

  3. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    8,285
    Quote Originally Posted by nwafan20
    I'm sorry if you find my knowledge of the aviation field not adequate, I do my best with my own personal knowledge.

    I apologize if I have offended you but from what I have seen with what he has done with US Airways I don't have much respect for the man. (again, No offense) I would hardly call him an "aviation genius"

    But in all seriousness, how many airlines does he want to merge with? DL/US isn't a very good fit...
    Could you expand on your statement? I think the man deserves a huge amount of respect. You seem to think he hasn't done allot for US, well for starters he keep US in business. If it wasn't for HP coming along like the white knight there would be lots of US birds in storage right now.

    There's more to this then meets the eye, US hasn't really said all to much about this. They can do allot if they take over Delta, keep their ops, dump their ops or keep what they want for US. We'll see how this pans out but look to Airbus again to put up some major bucks like they did with the US buy out. This would assure Airbus of having the biggest airline in the world as their customer... Interesting isn't?

  4. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    DTW
    Posts
    2,751
    Well for starters, post-9/11 US has been in 2 CH. 11's, nearly liquidated, and had Airbus bail them out.

    HP saved US Airways from ANOTHER Ch. 11 by merging with them, which I didn't like, HP was a fine airline, IMO, US Airways isn't..


    I have flown US on several occasions, I hate it. All the employees I have ran into were rude, their planes dirty, and are gearing towards an all bus fleet.

    He hasn't handled the HP/US merger very well, even after all this time, the airlines still havn't merged totally together.
    nwa FOREVER!

  5. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    8,285
    Quote Originally Posted by nwafan20
    Well for starters, post-9/11 US has been in 2 CH. 11's, nearly liquidated, and had Airbus bail them out.

    HP saved US Airways from ANOTHER Ch. 11 by merging with them, which I didn't like, HP was a fine airline, IMO, US Airways isn't..


    I have flown US on several occasions, I hate it. All the employees I have ran into were rude, their planes dirty, and are gearing towards an all bus fleet.

    He hasn't handled the HP/US merger very well, even after all this time, the airlines still havn't merged totally together.
    After all this time??? It took AA and TWA two years to merge fully and there are still signs of TWA at AA. You still haven't provided any facts to back up your statement about how Parker hasn't handled the merger correctly? Big deal they are going towards and all Airbus fleet, if that works for them so be it. Facts are important when it comes to making statements.

  6. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Bronx, New York
    Posts
    3,117
    [quote="nwafan20"]
    I have flown US on several occasions, I hate it. All the employees I have ran into were rude, their planes dirty, and are gearing towards an all bus fleet.

    Well nwafan20, I am sorry to hear about your bad experiences flying US and I am sorry you hate US so much but the experience you describe reminds me a lot of my experiences with your beloved NW. The all Airbus fleet you dislike so much sure beats that mostly 30-40 year old DC-9 fleet at NW. And although I normally fly US as an employee in the 40 or so flights I have taken in the last two years I did not witness the dirty aircraft or rude employees you encountered, I guess you had bad luck and I am sorry that happened to you. I hope one of these days you can try US again and have a positive experience like many do, I would love to see you become a US fan instead !

    LGA777

  7. #22
    Senior Member Bellucciman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Franklin Square, NY
    Posts
    363
    Pretty good debate going on here! My company was merged in 2003. Konica/Minolta.... I was part of the Konica end of the business. We purchased 55% and had the "upperhand" but my division (photo) was controlled by the Minolta group. And three years later we're out of business. Luckilly I was able to transfer to our medical imaging division (I miss my mini lab equipment though!).

    The parent company shut down the worldwide photo imaging business. My feeling was the poor management of the Minolta half combined with a ton of their debt and lousey digital camera products was a massive factor. Plus the state of the photo industry as a whole was and still is terrible.

    I don't know which of these two airlines would benefit from such a merger. I've flown both airlines and I think both have an equally good fleet (I tend to favor the Boeing jets more than the Airbus jets). I guess only time will tell if the merger happens. Should be an interesting ride though.

  8. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    8,285
    I don't know which of these two airlines would benefit from such a merger. I've flown both airlines and I think both have an equally good fleet (I tend to favor the Boeing jets more than the Airbus jets). I guess only time will tell if the merger happens. Should be an interesting ride though.
    The only ones who will benefit will be the lawyers, stockholders, high priced consultants, and upper management who will be given huge golden parachutes.

  9. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    944
    Amen to that. And those bankers and lawyers and such rarely (if ever) have to fly economy class like most of the customers, or worry about their next paycheck like most of the employees. I don't want to spark a debate about whether or not America is becoming a 2-class society, but it's evident that Wall Street and management generally does whatever's best for Wall Street and management. I well understand the economic benefits to the shareholders of US and creditors of DL of the proposed deal, but it's sad that labor and the traveling public have little or no leverage here. Never thought I'd say it, but I'd rather see the government loosen up the foreign ownership laws to promote investment and growth of the industry than see more consolidation and job losses. I imagine DL would be an interesting investment for foreign carriers (or investors) if the laws didn't restrict it. Oddly enough, Citigroup who is financing the US bid has many large foreign shareholders, including a Saudi prince, so in the era of globalization it all seems a matter of semantics...

  10. #25
    Senior Member hiss srq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Around here and near there.
    Posts
    5,565
    The talk of work today was this proposed merger and I find along with myself the vast amount of my co workers do not wantr this to happen. The plus. Our stock jumped a huge amount today. I am deep in prayer this does not go through. Right now we are entering an exciting and promiseing era for our airline and I am afraid that will die off if we merge with Delta. Fleet commonality is another thing you have to look at. It would make no sense at all.
    Southwest Airlines-"Once it pop's it's time to stop" Southwest Airlines-"Our Shamu's are almost real" Southwest Airlines -"We blow our top real easy" Southwest Airlines- "You can't top us..... really"

  11. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    DTW
    Posts
    2,751
    The point with the HP/US merger, take it one step at a time, finish the first merger first before you start going after others.

    Well, most people I post with on other boards don't like US either. The Airbus thing is a personal preference.

    Evidence? What about how he ran US into 2 CH. 11's and nearly liquidated them. Isn't that enough evidence of a failed CEO?

    I'm sorry to hear about your bad experience with NW, I have never had any problem with them, quite the contrary, I have nothing but good things to say about them. I would take a DC-9 over a bus any day, and US still has several old 737's. NW has investigated and determined that they can run the Dc-9's cheaper than buying a new aircraft even at current fuel prices.
    nwa FOREVER!

  12. #27
    Senior Member hiss srq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Around here and near there.
    Posts
    5,565
    Well first off facts might want to be corrected Parker was not our CEO during the time frame that we were in Ch. 11 Wolf was and he is gone number one. Number two we bust our asses for our customers excuse my french moderators that be. We work hard for our clients and you are not taking into account the new USAirways sir. I have too flown Northwest and their F/A's were more stuck up than bill gates in the hood. Plus the obvious management issues in that airline which are far worse than any our airline faces and for crying out loud your pilots wont come back to work for you. We are getting over 70% of our pilots who were called back to report in is the statistic I have been given. Do not throw stones at Airways when your stones are hollow please.
    Southwest Airlines-"Once it pop's it's time to stop" Southwest Airlines-"Our Shamu's are almost real" Southwest Airlines -"We blow our top real easy" Southwest Airlines- "You can't top us..... really"

  13. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    8,285
    Quote Originally Posted by nwafan20
    The point with the HP/US merger, take it one step at a time, finish the first merger first before you start going after others.

    Well, most people I post with on other boards don't like US either. The Airbus thing is a personal preference.

    Evidence? What about how he ran US into 2 CH. 11's and nearly liquidated them. Isn't that enough evidence of a failed CEO?

    I'm sorry to hear about your bad experience with NW, I have never had any problem with them, quite the contrary, I have nothing but good things to say about them. I would take a DC-9 over a bus any day, and US still has several old 737's. NW has investigated and determined that they can run the Dc-9's cheaper than buying a new aircraft even at current fuel prices.
    Are you freaking kidding me??? Parker never ran US before he bought them?? Where did you get that he ran US into Chap 11 twice?? Get your facts straight. NWA was smart keeping the 9s when oil was cheap but now they are costing them a mint to run. btw NWA was recently rated last in customer service by JD Power.

  14. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Bronx, New York
    Posts
    3,117
    Mr NWAFAN20 you are really testing my patience with things you think you know a lot about but are proving to this board you know little. US had two Chap 11's and was on the verge of collapse, we came so close to liquidation and many gave us up for dead. All under the old East management. It was Doug Parker CEO of HP who had the visionary to convince investors to purchase US (without using HP's money) and for regulators to approve the merger. LESS THAN A YEAR AFTER THIS US/HP MERGER US's 1st QUARTER PROFIT WAS ONE OF THE LARGEST FOR THAT QUARTER OF ALL THE WORLDS AIRLINES. If that is not visionary or genius, then please tell me what is ? Oh and BTW many of his employees have tremendous respect for him. When was the last time that happened at NW ?

    LGA777

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •