Printable View
Went out after work to grab a few shots.
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y95...fk_061807a.jpg
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y95...fk_061807a.jpg
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y95...o_a310_jfk.jpg
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y95...fk_061807a.jpg
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y95...fk_061807a.jpg
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y95...fk_061807a.jpg
Pretty shots! and that sexy A310 to boot!
Glad you got the ATA DC-10 Eric, nice shot.
awesome shots nice pic of Israir
Whoa nice ATA!
Great shots Eric
ATA = SEX
Does anyone notice what is missing from the ATA DC-10?
Other than some paint and a washing?
OK OK I will give one hint, It is tucked away.
Center main landing gear.
Great catch on the ATA Eric. Nice light.
Thanks Guys,
That was the one I was hoping to catch when I went out, then I found out that a Vietnam 777 came in minutes before I arrived at the mounds. That would have been a nice catch.
Eric
Excellent shots. Congrats on getting the ATA DC-10.
That's right. Do you know why?Quote:
Originally Posted by Futterman
Is it beacuse its optional ? I know the A330 has an option for a center main landing gearQuote:
Originally Posted by Phil D.
No. The only DC-10 without the CMLG is the -10 variant. ATA's '10 is a -30.Quote:
Originally Posted by AirtrafficController
The thing was designed to support more weight on the -30 and -40 models, and can actually be extended or retracted independent of the outboard landing gear. Doing this comes with all the typical operational and mechanical benefits, so I'd put my money on the possibility that the plane was light enough to keep the center gear stowed. Or it was broken.
Brian
PS - ATA. DC-10. LGA. Ever?
Yes, the center gear was made retractable on it for airports like LGA....as three bogeys put too much impact weight ont he runways. However, by retracting the center one, the max allowed weight decreases.
NYCMedic taught mt this last night. I can't take credit.
Becuase of that, an ATA DC-10 is conceivable.Some freakish sub could happen, but I think that most peopel woudl assume that the DC-10 isn't a good plane to bring into LGA and would not bring it in.
But it certainly wouldn't be the first time a DC-10 showed up at LGA, and I'm sure with a little notice, the entire NYCA spotting community would be out to catch her!Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil D.
Oh, of course. The heavy three-holer at LGA would draw quite a crowd.
Without thinking too much, that doesn't sound right to me. I'm under the impression that the additional bogey would be good for LaGuardia, since it would serve to distribute the weight over a larger area.Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil D.
Then again, I suppose having the center gear acts more to serve the airplane than the runway. Thinking back to the Eastern A300s, I remember hearing that they were pulled from LGA service because the narrow wheel-base put too much weight over too small an area. So perhaps with three bogeys down, the wheel base on the DC-10 would be narrower than if it only extended the two. Whatever.
Brian
I thought the same thign, Brian.
Teh extra bogey allow the PLANE to carry more weight, not to redistribute weight among the runway.
By removing that bogey, you do not therefore add more weight to the remaining ones, as the allowed load is lighter anyway....it doesn't add more weight to the remaining bogeys.
Speaking of a Heavy three holer, somebody E-Mailed me this video once..... Oh wait Phil was referring to the DC-10 Sorry! Anyway, Phil is correct, the main body gear can be locked up for landings at smaller airports like LGA but of course there is a penalty with the allowable load. Considering most flights into LGA are fairly short haul you don't need to worry about an aircraft being laden with fuel, bags, and cargo. Phil you need to get on up into Ops-Con and leave those ramp rats behind.Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil D.
Interesting, is ATA going to leave the NW base paint (silver) on there? It looks nice actually.