Post Your Recent REJECTIONS!

My interpretation doesn't look yellow enough, Manny.

Thanks Manny and Cary - I have the raw original so I'll make it look like a cold hard....LOL..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MarkLawrence

Thanks Manny and Cary - I have the raw original so I'll make it look like a cold hard....LOL..

---

Mark, in all seriousness, take a look at the red channel. It looks blown out... so think about desaturating the red channel or even the yellow orange tint or sat sliders in Lightroom... or in Photoshop ...

:)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gonzalu

Mark, in all seriousness, take a look at the red channel. It looks blown out... so think about desaturating the red channel or even the yellow orange tint or sat sliders in Lightroom... or in Photoshop ...:)

---

Let me not go into the accepted on jp, rejected on A.net saga :) :) :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MarkLawrence

Let me not go into the accepted on jp, rejected on A.net saga :) :) :)

---

Happens to me often enough too... :smile:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MarkLawrence

Let me not go into the accepted on jp, rejected on A.net saga :) :) :)

---

I can name that tune in 3 notes...

You know Manny - I drove past there again this evening - and - the lighting - is - really an orange/red with the lights on the ramp - so - if I made it colder - does that count as digital manipulation?? LOL...just asking...

Mark, OF COURSE it is... but you'd be barking up the wrong tree in some circles :tongue:

Any hope appealing this one? It was rejected for being soft but the pinstripes look sharp to me.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...dited_4711.jpg

Chris, the tail logo is soft... You may want to try USM a bit more on that area alone. Also, the other edges may be bordering on oversharpened... I am on my s h i t t y work PC so I could be wrong :tongue:

Thanks Manny--I tried your suggestions but was again rejected for soft http://nycaviation.com/forum/webkit-...E/confused.gif


Any thoughts on these:


"Soft/jagged in places grainy soft oversharpened contrast"
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...91img_4995.jpg

This one was rejected for soft and quality, but I don't see the problem. The titles and colors are bordering on oversharpened.
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...eedit_5484.jpg

Also, any thoughts on the best way to save my images after I edit them? I'm using Photoshop CS6 Extended on a Mac, but I've noticed that the saved images are usually much softer than the image in Photoshop pre-saving.

http://www.jetphotos.net/img/4/6/5/2...1350271256.jpg
- Undersharpened (Soft)
http://www.jetphotos.net/img/4/8/3/1...1350353138.jpg
- Undersharpened (Soft)
http://www.jetphotos.net/img/4/5/7/7...1350271775.jpg
- Categories wrong or missing
- Bad Info in the following field(s): Registration,Serial Number/CN
(» United States - US Air Force (USAF)
» Boeing C-17A Globemaster III » New York John F. Kennedy Int'l Airport - KJFK
» USA - New York
Registration/CN/Date Photographer
» 980265 / CN:
» October 13, 2012 » akash deen (65197)

Guys little help on the info. for the C-17
Thanks

C-17A 88-0265 C/N F004/P1

I always go to http://www.scramble.nl/milbase.htm for military information - usually the best to find everything.

Thanks Mark.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MarkLawrence

C-17A 88-0265 C/N F004/P1

I always go to http://www.scramble.nl/milbase.htm for military information - usually the best to find everything.

---

A.net
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...72pt-mva-1.jpg
Reject reason: 1000 pix minimum j1351953573.0572pt-mva-1.jpg blurry size soft common personal...
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...09ja784a-1.jpg
Reject reason: quality size soft overexposed...

What size should i use? I'm using 1024*683 resolution 1600