Re: JFK 8/3 (now with review & some pics)
Re: JFK 8/3 (now with review & some pics)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil D.
Is that faded red on the front or is it intentional orange? MI woudl like that plane so much more if it wasn't like that. I think it makes the plane look like bad.
I think it is. None of my shots have the plane as beet red anywhere.
Re: JFK 8/3 (now with review & some pics)
I said 'is it this or that' and you said 'yes'. Fail.
Re: JFK 8/3 (now with review & some pics)
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-Bird76
Quote:
Originally Posted by GothamSpotter
Also, if anyone would like like a brief lesson on how to make a watermark that actually looks pretty good, shoot me a pm. It's actually very easy. :)
WATERMARK COMMENT DELETED BY MODS
Fair enough. As such, the photos have been removed.
Re: JFK 8/3 (now with review & some pics)
Quote:
Originally Posted by "mirrodie
Fair enough. As such, the photos have been removed.
WGAF how the watermarks look? If it's protecting your work, by all means...
Re: JFK 8/3 (now with review & some pics)
Well considering the time it takes to upload to anet, jpnet and also share them here, I guess I'm not up for being knocked about watermarks.
Re: JFK 8/3 (now with review & some pics)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mirrodie
Well considering the time it takes to upload to anet, jpnet and also share them here, I guess I'm not up for being knocked about watermarks.
It’s not a knock. It’s an observation. The watermarks didn't do anything to enhance the photo at all, same with Nick's. You also don't have to put a watermark on shots that size, they are too small to be used for any commercial use. Watermarks for larger shots may be suggested but I don't put them on my shots at JP.net, I think they take away from the picture no matter how professionally they are applied.
Re: JFK 8/3 (now with review & some pics)
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-Bird76
Quote:
Originally Posted by mirrodie
Well considering the time it takes to upload to anet, jpnet and also share them here, I guess I'm not up for being knocked about watermarks.
It’s not a knock. It’s an observation. The watermarks didn't do anything to enhance the photo at all, same with Nick's. You also don't have to put a watermark on shots that size, they are too small to be used for any commercial use. Watermarks for larger shots may be suggested but I don't put them on my shots at JP.net, I think they take away from the picture no matter how professionally they are applied.
No harm no foul. Its simply that certain comments can be misinterpreted.
I myself didnt care for the watermarks I made. So in the future I'll just upload and link the files as I have been doing.
Re: JFK 8/3 (now with review & some pics)
Re: JFK 8/3 (now with review & some pics)
Kenny, your sharpening is good. Excellent shots.
Re: JFK 8/3 (now with review & some pics)
Re: JFK 8/3 (now with review & some pics)
Thanks Brian...I can't wait until the light gets better at HoBe, now that I have the 100-400.
Re: JFK 8/3 (now with review & some pics)
Re: JFK 8/3 (now with review & some pics)
Yea, serious thanks to Barry for the afternoon 4R location. Kenny, skell-hole...really? I am looking at an apartment to rent over there.
Re: JFK 8/3 (now with review & some pics)
Do you guys care to share this magical location? :)