Mark thanks, i'll try and not use that feature.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zee71
Printable View
Mark thanks, i'll try and not use that feature.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zee71
i was thinking that when was uploading, but i was using the histogram reading...Quote:
Originally Posted by moose135
Thanks, Manny, for the help with the Learjet.
This one was rejected for being unlevel, but my Photoshop ruler shows it as level when measured from underneath the 727 to the nose of the Spanish A310.
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...51swf_5488.jpg
Using that tarmac/grass edge for leveling will only work if the tarmac/grass line is exactly perpendicular to your lens. It does have a little bit of "needs CCW rotation" look to it, but I don't know what you'd base your leveling on. Maybe the nose gear strut at 100%. Looks very minor though...maybe .1 to .2 CCW.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris102
Too much red/yellow - personal color.
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...l-09152012.jpg
Mark, your photo was probably realistic for the lighting situation, but A.net probably wants something more like this: http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u36/soak2179/ml.jpg
I just played with the Color Balance in PS, but if you have a RAW file and can change WB/Tint, that would be easier.
Trust him, he knows...Quote:
Originally Posted by Cary
;-)
:mad:Quote:
Originally Posted by moose135
:wink::wink:
Agreed Chris... it looks too CW ... add a bit of CCW and be done ... awesome shot!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Cary
Mark, it's more like
http://pictures.mannyphoto.com/photo...Z8t55CQ-X3.jpg
My interpretation doesn't look yellow enough, Manny.
Thanks Manny and Cary - I have the raw original so I'll make it look like a cold hard....LOL..
Mark, in all seriousness, take a look at the red channel. It looks blown out... so think about desaturating the red channel or even the yellow orange tint or sat sliders in Lightroom... or in Photoshop ...Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkLawrence
:)
Let me not go into the accepted on jp, rejected on A.net saga :) :) :)Quote:
Originally Posted by gonzalu
Happens to me often enough too... :smile:Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkLawrence
I can name that tune in 3 notes...Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkLawrence
You know Manny - I drove past there again this evening - and - the lighting - is - really an orange/red with the lights on the ramp - so - if I made it colder - does that count as digital manipulation?? LOL...just asking...
Mark, OF COURSE it is... but you'd be barking up the wrong tree in some circles :tongue:
Any hope appealing this one? It was rejected for being soft but the pinstripes look sharp to me.
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...dited_4711.jpg
Chris, the tail logo is soft... You may want to try USM a bit more on that area alone. Also, the other edges may be bordering on oversharpened... I am on my s h i t t y work PC so I could be wrong :tongue:
Thanks Manny--I tried your suggestions but was again rejected for soft http://nycaviation.com/forum/webkit-...E/confused.gif
Any thoughts on these:
"Soft/jagged in places grainy soft oversharpened contrast"
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...91img_4995.jpg
This one was rejected for soft and quality, but I don't see the problem. The titles and colors are bordering on oversharpened.
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...eedit_5484.jpg
Also, any thoughts on the best way to save my images after I edit them? I'm using Photoshop CS6 Extended on a Mac, but I've noticed that the saved images are usually much softer than the image in Photoshop pre-saving.
http://www.jetphotos.net/img/4/6/5/2...1350271256.jpg
- Undersharpened (Soft)
http://www.jetphotos.net/img/4/8/3/1...1350353138.jpg
- Undersharpened (Soft)
http://www.jetphotos.net/img/4/5/7/7...1350271775.jpg
- Categories wrong or missing
- Bad Info in the following field(s): Registration,Serial Number/CN
(» United States - US Air Force (USAF)
» Boeing C-17A Globemaster III » New York John F. Kennedy Int'l Airport - KJFK
» USA - New York
Registration/CN/Date Photographer
» 980265 / CN:
» October 13, 2012 » akash deen (65197)
Guys little help on the info. for the C-17
Thanks
C-17A 88-0265 C/N F004/P1
I always go to http://www.scramble.nl/milbase.htm for military information - usually the best to find everything.
Thanks Mark.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkLawrence
A.net
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...72pt-mva-1.jpg
Reject reason: 1000 pix minimum j1351953573.0572pt-mva-1.jpg blurry size soft common personal...
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...09ja784a-1.jpg
Reject reason: quality size soft overexposed...
What size should i use? I'm using 1024*683 resolution 1600
Akie,
Why did you upload at less than 1000? You just didn't know or was it an accident? It is also a bit soft indeed. Nothing you can't easily fix :-)
Hey Manny,
I didn't know what was the size..i had it pre-set in lightroom @ 1024*683 and some how it was coming out less that 1000...think i just found the problem i was cropping @ 5*7 when it should of been 2*3/4*6..Quote:
Originally Posted by gonzalu
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...281n652sw3.jpg
"Low contrast, narrow 1 pixel wide border all around image." My biggest question is I don't see the 1 pixel border. I've had a couple more rejected for border,and I can't figure out why. I'm using Element 10 for editing,and I haven't had a border issue until recently.
Doug
If you open up http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...281n652sw3.jpg against a dark background (like in Firefox), there is a faint/transparent 1px border around the image. Sometimes happens after you sharpen.Quote:
Originally Posted by nssd70
What's the bestway to avoid getting the border after sharpening?Quote:
Originally Posted by Cary
Doug
Wow, I have not heard of that happening before. That would be a hassle if you have to do another crop at the end of your workflow just to make sure it is not there. About the picture, what is going on with the nose of the plane? Looks like some skin work, it almost has a "zipper scar" on it. :frown:Quote:
Originally Posted by nssd70
May have repaired a little ramp rash or something.Quote:
Originally Posted by JDANDO
Whenever I have that problem, when I resize down from the original, I make the photo 1px bigger on each side (so 1002x669 for a 1000x667 photo), then do the sharpening, and finally crop out the 1px edge by changing the canvas to -2px horizontal/vertical relative, making it 1000x667.Quote:
Originally Posted by nssd70
I like all the patch work on the plane. I have only ran into the border issue recently,and since I haven't changed the way that I edit,it is driving me nuts trying to figure out what I'm doing wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by JDANDO
Doug
Oversharpened and Blurry
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=4029880
Soft/undersharpened
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=4029879
does anyone see how this is oversharpened?
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=4055999
Contrast. Im not sure
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=4055993
Jaggies in the cheat stripe, and flat on the contrast. When correcting your levels, do it by individual color channel and not by RGB and that should help fix the problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by Delta777LR
Thanks KennyQuote:
Originally Posted by wunaladreamin
These were all rejected by jetphotos today.
http://www.jetphotos.net/img/3/5/4/8...1355097845.jpg
http://www.jetphotos.net/img/4/9/7/4...1355097479.jpg
http://www.jetphotos.net/img/3/3/4/3...1355097343.jpg
http://www.jetphotos.net/img/4/7/6/1...1355097167.jpg
http://www.jetphotos.net/img/3/7/0/9...1355096907.jpg
http://www.jetphotos.net/img/3/3/3/7...1355096733.jpg
http://www.jetphotos.net/img/4/0/1/4...1355096410.jpg
http://www.jetphotos.net/img/3/4/3/1...1355096134.jpg
Wasn't surprised most were not accepted. Only surprised about the Frontier and Airtran. The MD-90 Delta was only rejected because it was underexposed, so I may try again with that one.