http://jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1420081
http://jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1421449
Printable View
Ryan how on earth do you get your pictures rejected for bad info and on American metal?? All you have to do is fill in the regi field and it autofills the CN number for you? For that you should be banned! LOLOL :twisted:Quote:
Originally Posted by hiss srq
No surprise:
http://jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1427647
Since when did JFK have mountains in the back? Wrong place!Quote:
Originally Posted by Iberia A340-600
[quote=stuart schechter]Since when did JFK have mountains in the back? Wrong place![/quote:ac635]Quote:
Originally Posted by Iberia A340-600":ac635]No surprise:
[url="http://jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1427647
I could have sworn I fixed that...
About to say JFK never looked that good!
http://jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1424323
Bad framing/composition. Anything lower, and it's all fence and barbed wire. I think it does the job of showing an airplane on the ground, but, ca marche...
http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=1432491
Bad scan/dust, ok. that'll be fixed, but what was with the "Categories wrong or missing"? Tommy???
did you select it as "cargo"?Quote:
Originally Posted by wunaladreamin
I believe so. Is that incorrect?
No, that is what is supposed to be done.
I never posted here before because i typically can find the errors and the rejection is justified. but in this batch, i don't know what i did wrong, of course, stuff like bad framing i can fix, but i think I'm having most trouble with the "Over Processed / Bad postprocessing"
Thanks in advance for feedback
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1433971
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1433015
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1431135
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1432396
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1432985
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1432404
Over Processed/bad postprocessing means that the there was to much editing done to the photo. A few of these have a glow around the plane which indicates you edited them to the point the shot doesn't look real. The one's that are oversharpen do have alot of jaggies. What are you using to edit your pics?
Ok, I understand the "Bad framing", but overexposed???? Is it my monitor or is it really overexposed?
http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=1437463
It's overexposed. The white is very bright. There is a stripe of white below the tan body but the body looks brighter than the stripe in the front.
Man... I need to caliberate my monitor then lol
Thanks Tom,
i tired to fix it, but...
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1438942
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1438952
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1438954
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1439041
feedback is welcome
thanks
I like the photos man, but I think those are going to be for your personal collection.
Hmm...maybe forgot the business category?
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1444019
Never realized it was unlevel
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1444011
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1444014
I'm not sure what the screener meant by categories, its not a biz jet, they might have been looking for "vintage." I'd sharpen it up a touch and re-upload it. Leave the screener a comment it was rejected for categories but your not sure if it should be vintage or not. Sometimes the screener will check the right category if that's the case.Quote:
Originally Posted by heeshung
Wasn't level... :(
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...052607_FRG.jpg
Not the best pic but I liked the moon in with it and I figured what the hell...
http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=1453819
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/reje ... 11407a.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/reje ... 11407a.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/reje ... 11307a.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/reje ... 11307a.jpg
My post processing does not seem to be working for acceptence to Airliners any longer. Anybody have suggestios?
Thanks
Eric
Eric, those are a nice batch of shots but I can see why the Air Pacific might have gotten rejected. It appears that the nose of the aircraft blends into the white tank behind it. The Singapore shot looks a little over exposed at well but then again what do I know! :lol:
Not sure why the MU got rejected, looks fine to me.
Darn - just can't get things right on this BBJ with a fuel trail...
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1460376
That's a tough edit. If you fix the exposure on the plane it darkens the sky terribly. It's one for the personal collection me thinks.
Use the curves and shadow/highlightQuote:
Originally Posted by wunaladreamin
Quote:
Originally Posted by G-BOAD
Nice shot, but I think that ones for the personal collection my friend.
That's a great shot Kenny - shouldn't take a lot of editing to get that accepted!
Kenny you have some noise issues with the shot to, it might not get in on the second attempt. The screener probably just rejected for the comp/center reason since that stands out without checking off any other reason. What ISO were you using?Quote:
Originally Posted by wunaladreamin
I guess the Stearman struts got in the way of this airport overview shot:
"Obstructing Objects / Foreground Clutter"
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1477023
John I might appeal that one, the struts IMO give the shot some character, give it a go.Quote:
Originally Posted by moose135
Unfortunately so, great shot Moose but they are obscuring the entrance to that cul de sac and the runway. Forgot how beautiful Bayport is.Quote:
I guess the Stearman struts got in the way of this airport overview shot:
Good Grief...Quote:
Originally Posted by T-Bird76
I'll go with Tommy on that one Moose. Nice shot.
Tom