Nope - rejection on the appeal too - admin comments - Sorry, not up to JP standards - I'll wait for the next opportunity to get Shamu..
Printable View
Nope - rejection on the appeal too - admin comments - Sorry, not up to JP standards - I'll wait for the next opportunity to get Shamu..
All dark/underexposed
http://web2.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1382325
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1382326
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1382333
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1382334
Very sad about these two:
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1382328
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1382332
Can someone help me with this?
The first one was rejected for too much/too little contrast, Tommy told me to bump the contrast, I did. Now it was rejected for being undersharpened and too much/ too little contrast. Does it need even more or did I put too much in?
http://web2.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1390229
Matt email me the orginal and let me see what I can do with it. I think the screeners who screened it were bit to picky. I think the contrast is fine considering the light it was taken in.Quote:
Originally Posted by nwafan20
my email is [email protected]
No surprise whatsoever:
http://web2.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1393011
This one suprises me alot.
http://web2.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1392239
Matt
Where's the blur?
The blur very visable on the "All day every day low fares" and on the "Jetstar.com." Boost your shutter speed and that should fix future problems.Quote:
Originally Posted by Qantas_787
I thought this El Al would be good, but I guess I was wrong
http://web2.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1397612
A little surprised but I agree, the photos are overexposed. However I think it was in PS that they ended up that way.
http://web2.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1397500
http://web2.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1397503
http://web2.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1397516
I thought this one wouldn't make it........and was right!
http://web2.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1400612
I thought the surroundings added to this photo, guess not...
http://web2.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1402124
These two I'm a little bummed on, any more sharpening and I get the "jaggies" as is, it's too soft. Oh well.
http://web2.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1402127
http://web2.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1402128
What did I do wrong here? This is the first photo of the kind I have uploaded.
Rejected: Bad Info: Registration
http://web2.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1402703
Put the airport code in the regi field.Quote:
Originally Posted by nwafan20
Dedicated to all spotters around the world!!
http://web01.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=5965821
Oops... Didn't get the whole panel in. I wonder what categories I forgot...
http://web01.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1408145
Already pretty sure this one wouldn't make it because of the backlight.
http://web01.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1408141
Forgot about the stairs, and guess they wanted to see the whole rotor.
http://web01.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1408103
I think it's level! Only the aircraft is unlevel due the take-offQuote:
Originally Posted by njgtr82
Nope its not level, if you look at the various poles in the background they all are tilting to the right. I'd rotate the shot .1 or .2 CCW and sharpen it up a bit, should be good to go then.Quote:
Originally Posted by grazysub
Oh dear...got some work to do...or..probably..it's the time of day that I can get out of the office to do somew shooting...12 noon is probably not the best...
http://web01.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1409000
http://web01.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1408998
http://web01.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1408996
*Sigh* reject:
http://web01.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1409968
The light poles, and even the roofs in the background, look to be leaning left. I thought someone mentioned that up thread when you first posted this one. Shouldn't be difficult to fix.Quote:
Originally Posted by nwafan20
Don't get hung up on just the poles. They can be deceiving especially if they are not sitting stright. The trick is the horizon. Look at the picture without concentrating on the plane and you will instantly see how the shot is leaning to the left. Once you get some practice you will be able to look at the horizon and then the buildings as a whole and see how level the shot is without trusting poles.Quote:
The light poles, and even the roofs in the background, look to be leaning left
I was kind of bummed about this one..
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rej ... net1jt.jpg
That's way too artistic for a.net - looks too dark too!Quote:
Originally Posted by flyboy 28
Shucks. I rather liked it. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by moose135
Looks like it's time for me to learn how to use "Noise Ninja":
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1420070
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1420071
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1420073
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1420076
Can you find the dust spots? (I sure can't)
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1420074
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1420077
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1420085
Phil equalize the pictures and you'll see the dust spots. I can see them without equalizing the pictures. You have some in the upper right and lower left corners. The one on the lower left is rather large.Quote:
Originally Posted by pgengler
Lower your ISO to, looks like you were shooting in ISO 400 or above. My recommendation for shooting at the Marina, first only shoot there after 2 PM from May to October otherwise the light is really harsh. Second, shoot in shutter mode at 500th of a second at ISO 100 or 200. On a bright sunny day ISO 100 is your best bet.
Phil, another tip, in addition to what Tommy noted about ISO...it looks like the sky is grainy in some of your shots. When you sharpen the photo, do you select only the aircraft? If not, that can cause you problems with grain in the sky as well.
Actually, the ISO for those was only 250 (which I used over 100 because I wanted to keep the shutter speed up, especially with the big 100-400 lens)
Going back to the originals, it looks like there's noise in the sky even without sharpening (sigh); I'll have to try just selecting the plane for sharpening, though. Thanks.
Since I'm new to the photo processing concept, what exactly do you use to sharpen the photo? Is it just the sharpen tool in Photoshop, or is there something else?
Unsharp mask in photoshop (Filter-sharpen-unsharp mask) You will also hear it called USM (UnSharp Mask)
Cool, thanks nwafan20!
No problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by ATAIndy
You might find this older thread useful with settings for USM.
WOW...I'm suprised ..but..I guess I have work to do on these...
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1421056
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1421063
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1421068