Printable View
Mel, you are starting to scare me. Yeah, no, You are way too interesting in this story. :wink:Quote:
Originally Posted by Mellyrose
And Matt, nevermind the fat smelly dudes. Ever watch that AIRLINE show about Southwest? Ever seen the size of some of the women that board those planes wearing outfits too small for them, probably showing more skin than this gal did?
As Phil said, something does not add up.
Yeah, no...just pointing the facts out. I haven't taken any sides ;)
1. She is entitled to dress anyway she pleases
2. The airline is entitled to enforce "standards" of behavior or dress on their flights--even if they are subjective standards
But what bothers me is, when did young people decide that carrying themselves with CLASS was not stylish?
Seeing her panties has nothing to do with lighting, when the hem on your skirt is less than six inches from the band, your hoo-ha is gonna hang out. Period. Molnar, you for one know that when I wear skirts TWICE as long I cover my backside and ask you to walk behind me on stairs so to keep my "business" private.
She needs to relax. They embaressed her. She should stop giving the airline her business. Not sue for damages.
The lack of taste shown by her apparel is only surpassed by her speed to "lawyer up."
*also... did anyone else who watched the MSN video notice that the lawyer compared and justified his client's dress by referencing the pantheon of style, Paris Hilton... that's his opening argument? Sheesh.
TELL ME 'BOUT IT SOUL SISTA!
You're right. It's a shame that people feel they need to go to court to get the right to dress in a self-degrading manner.
I also GUARANTEE that she had MUCH more cleavage showing. If a parent were to complain about that, I think it's valid for the airline to ask her to adjust herself.