It all over the lower half of the plane Mark. Bit hard to see in the shadow but there's evidence of it.Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkLawrence
Printable View
It all over the lower half of the plane Mark. Bit hard to see in the shadow but there's evidence of it.Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkLawrence
- Undersharpened (Soft)
- Too much or too little contrast
- Categories wrong or missing
http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=2558147
- Dark / Underexposed
- Undersharpened (Soft)
http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=2558156
Blurry
http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=2558154
Thoughts anyone?
Jeremy, on the B-24, make sure you select Genre = Civilian and Category = Warbird/Vintage. Don't know what you had selected, but former military aircraft, operating with civilian registrations, need to have Civilian selected. It does look a little soft to me, but the bigger issue is the lighting - was it backlit (or just overcast) when you shot it? The blown-out background really kills it for me.
Again, the Hornet looks like it may have been a bit backlit, resulting in a dark aircraft. The sharpening looks OK for me, could use a touch more, but the two big sites seem to like a little more than that. The Gulfstream looks like a tough shot, nice work with panning, but I can see definite blurriness on the winglet.
Moose, the B24 was overcast. The dark aircraft skin doesn't mesh very well with a brighter overcast sky.
The Hornet was toplit - departure at high noon in overcast. :-/
I'll see if I can touch them up any, thanks.
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2575759
JPEG Compression Artifacts???
On my monitor Moose, there seems to be a lot of noise in the left hand building. Maybe that's what they were referring to?Quote:
Originally Posted by moose135
Got rejected for missing categories, anyone can help me explain what they mean by that??
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2592233
Sergio, I think you may have forgotten to check the Cargo Plane and Night Shot categories.Quote:
Originally Posted by Delta777LR
Quote:
Originally Posted by AirtrafficController
Thanks Luke!
Rejected for A) personal and B) soft from a.net - thoughts?
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/reje ... p_0876.jpg
I like this shot alot but nose looks a little soft to meQuote:
Originally Posted by jerslice
I hate these rejections:
Reason(s) For Rejection:
- Oversharpen
- Undersharpened (Soft)
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2600264
What did the personal note say?Quote:
Originally Posted by jerslice
Usually when I get one of those, the screener gives more detail on the reason for the rejection.
No personal note that I saw, just the rejection.
It was in the email I got, it just took me awhile to find it :-)Quote:
No personal note that I saw, just the rejection.
He just recommended giving it another USM pass and send it back.
Hmm, overexposed...
Fixable?
http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=2620933
http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=2620938
http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=2622978
Wanted to get the moon in, but I guess it didn't work out.
Personally - I would forget the moon - that's a great shot centered in the frame!Quote:
Originally Posted by heeshung
Guess I did a little tpp much on this - I really need to get this monitor calibrated - anyone got any step by step instructions??
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2637847
Got this great shot with Mark down in MIA, but I got a "Horizon Unlevel" rejection. This is a common reason, I seem to not really have the eyes for the horizon in photoshop. I tried leveling against the runway line, but that didn't seem to work. What would you guys suggest using as a reference point in this picture, the fence? That would give the picture such an awkward angle though. I am torn...
http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=2663357
You don't level to the foreground you level to the horizon the farest point in the picture. In this case the building's roof line would be what you level to. You should also use the grid lines when leveling vs. trying to do it by sight. This shot needs .3 to .4 of CW rotation.Quote:
Originally Posted by kc2aqg
Sometimes when buildings are the only thing in the shot to level off of, they lie. For example, if when you crop a shot you're left with buildings that all angle away from you (ie, the roof lines are not in fact parallel to you and therefore not level to the horizon), it can be best to go with the lines created where the wall(s) meet, or with telephone polls. But many times this will not appear to be level, even though it actually is.Quote:
In this case the building's roof line would be what you level to.
Rejected for "Blurry", with a note from the screener-in-training "nose a bit blurry". I don't see it...
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rej ... _002_a.jpg
And yes, it's the same photo I just posted as my most recent JP.net acceptance.
Got a bunch rejected for dirty scan/CMOS dust spots. Didn't catch them before.
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2691164
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2691162
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2691135
http://i142.photobucket.com/albums/r...1253673215.jpg
http://i142.photobucket.com/albums/r...1253480525.jpg
http://i142.photobucket.com/albums/r...1253479679.jpg
Are there any more that I don't immediately see besides the one I pointed out? What's the best way to remove them?
this one is rejected at A.net because bad motive, creative shot
your opinion please
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=6675382
greetings,
Jeroen
Considering A.net takes pictures of shadows of planes on corn fields I'm not sure why this wasn't taken??? Quality is great.Quote:
Originally Posted by grazysub
I dont get what happened here
http://jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2714111
http://jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2714069
Hmm I don't what's with the digital manipulation for the first one. For the AA, I don't think its blurry but the aircraft is not centered in the frame.Quote:
Originally Posted by Delta777LR
On the Scanderbeg you can see the spots where it looks like you used healing brush, the sky is a bit grainy but those spots are completely smooth. Barely visible to the naked eye, but stands out a lot if you view equalized.Quote:
Originally Posted by Delta777LR
AA is definitely not blurry, but it is a bit low in the frame, try re-cropping it.
You have visable clone marks in the sky Serigo on the first one. The second AA shot the forward part of the plane isn't in focus.Quote:
Originally Posted by Delta777LR
Mark, me thinks you should have uploaded using all of the info you would use for a regular aircraft shot, and then checked "wing shot" off.Quote:
Originally Posted by heeshung
Maybe they want you to upload it as a "wing view" with the data of the aircraft you were flying in?
Quote:
Originally Posted by wunaladreamin
Yeah, apparently so. I looked through the database and some airport overview photos had part of the engine and/or wing. I figured that since the main focus of the photo was the airport I'd put it as the subject.Quote:
Originally Posted by moose135
I reuploaded with the details of the plane.
Here's one for grainy. I obviously know it's a little grainy, but it comes with this shot...it's a moving aircraft at night, after all!
http://lh5.ggpht.com/_XZ-ysxSDq7c/Sv...IMG_0161v2.jpg
I personaly dont entirely see how this is undersharpened(soft)
If anyone sees it is whats the best way to fix this minor problem?
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2751283
It's a bit soft Sergio. Add more USM to the plane and a little more contrast to the image.Quote:
Originally Posted by Delta777LR
"Part of Aircraft Cut Off"
http://jetphotos.net/img/1/6/0/2/65250_1257475206.jpg
Well, obviously...but I cropped it this way deliberately.
Moose on a rejection like this, I believe that the part they are referring to is the forward-most rotor blade. I think if that one blade was "all in" they would accept.
Perhaps these aren't perfect, but I thought that they had a chance. I can't figure out why the registration number in the southwest shot got a bit smudged while the rest looks okay.
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2759715
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2759704