http://www.flightglobal.com/Articles/20 ... Cargo.html
Livery is a bit of a disappointment. I was expecting something closer to their new house scheme.
-Will
Printable View
http://www.flightglobal.com/Articles/20 ... Cargo.html
Livery is a bit of a disappointment. I was expecting something closer to their new house scheme.
-Will
Me too, but I guess the expense of the Dreamliner scheme isn't really justified for a plane with such a utilitarian and narrow purpose.Quote:
Originally Posted by Winglets747
wow...that is plain...and...isn't it based on -400F? - no winglets?
Based on the 747-400. Airplane will normally be flying very light, so, there will be fuel savings already & not sure how the winglets would impact the unusually shaped fuselage.... :?:Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkLawrence
Shes fairly ugly I think.Colors put aside even I think but it gets the job done and that is what counts. I wonder what kind of performance diffrences there are? I am sure that it handles quite diffrently from the rest too.
Tower Air lives.
Oh, funny name though! Dreamlifter... nice one Boeing! :)
Yeah, their regular house livery would look better on that.
I think the bubble looks like a long pill for insomnia especially with the name DreamLifter right on the pill.